On 26.02.2013, at 21:23, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 26.2.2013, at 22.20, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Actually, while going through all those files and writing this mail, all
>> missing messages appeared in my MUA, and I do find in both maillogs:
>>
>> @mx1:
>> | dovecot: dsync-local(test): Error: d
On 26.2.2013, at 22.20, Michael Grimm wrote:
> BUT: It look as if I haven't waited long enough for replication to become
> finished, sorry :-(
>
> Actually, while going through all those files and writing this mail, all
> missing messages appeared in my MUA, and I do find in both maillogs:
>
On 26.02.2013, at 10:55, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I can't reproduce this. Some interesting questions:
>
> * If you include hostname+counter in the message, what do the mailboxes look
> like in the different sides? Did they skip over some numbers or did they both
> stop at some specific remote co
On 2013-02-26 10:55, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.2.2013, at 17.38, Michael Grimm
wrote:
Yes. I would expect 400 messages at every inbox, but normally I do
end up with around 270 in an inbox, and both inboxes do show slightly
different numbers (e.g. 245 and 297). (Looks like stopping.)
I can
On 25.2.2013, at 17.38, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 2013-02-25 15:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>>> Whenever I do run those tests with a delay of 1 second between every
>>> injection, I do observe, that not all mails injected become visible in my
>>>
On 2013-02-25 15:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm
wrote:
Whenever I do run those tests with a delay of 1 second between every
injection, I do observe, that not all mails injected become visible in
my MUAs (Mail.app and Roundcube), immediately. All "get new mail"
On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Whenever I do run those tests with a delay of 1 second between every
> injection, I do observe, that not all mails injected become visible in my
> MUAs (Mail.app and Roundcube), immediately. All "get new mail" functionality
> or MUA restarts fails
Thank you very much Michael.
I'll set it up again, because I think that initially I was not using any
aggregator service. My setup is a little atypical as I have servers
spread-out on 2 (soon 3) continents that are connected via slow uplinks.
Hopefully the v2.2 is more stable and less buggy for t
Il 21/02/2013 16:34, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
Please test and report any bugs found!
Hi,
I'm running dovecot 2.2b2 , for the first time, with vpopmail-auth and
works fine.
But I found this bug, also present in 2.1.15. When I enable dict quota
with mysql and in dovecot DB there is no entry
Hi --
On 2013-02-21 Michescu Andrei wrote:
Can you post to the list your working configurations for dovecot?
(This is based on
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-March/064513.html)
My design:
single user "vmail" to run dsync over ssh
(one may use root instead)
Thus, m
On 2/21/2013 8:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I've been running 2.2beta1 in production since it got out and I haven't had
> any issues. However, my setup is simply IMAP/POP3 without any complicated
> configurations. This is on FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE with about 100 users.
> I've just updated to 2.2
Hello Michael,
Can you post to the list your working configurations for dovecot?
I've been fighting with the dsync replication a while ago and was super
buggy so I've put that project on ice.
If now it finally works I would like to get it moving again.
Best,
Andrei
> On 21.02.2013, at 21:17, T
On 21.02.2013, at 21:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> But, if I do restart any one of both dovecot servers involved, those
>> remaining missing messages are fetched instantaneously.
>
> Possibly a bug, see if it still happens with beta2.
Sorry, I did
On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm wrote:
> I am running v2.2beta1 for almost a week now (handful of users, ~1000
> mails/day). And yes, I can confirm that replication works ...
>
>> Please test and report any bugs found!
>
> ... there is only a "feature request" left:
>
> I did run a lot
On 21.02.2013, at 16:34, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> A ton of fixes since beta1. Especially the new dsync and the replication
> server related to that should really work now.
I am running v2.2beta1 for almost a week now (handful of users, ~1000
mails/day). And yes, I can confirm that replication wo
I've been running 2.2beta1 in production since it got out and I haven't had
any issues. However, my setup is simply IMAP/POP3 without any complicated
configurations. This is on FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE with about 100 users.
I've just updated to 2.2b2...
On 21 February 2013 18:34, Timo Sirainen wrote:
16 matches
Mail list logo
