also sprach Steffen Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.09.0902 +0200]:
> Sendmail uses different mailers (exim calls them transports, if
> I remember correctly) for the two different maildrops, "scripts"
> are invoked by the virtual "*prog*" mailer, whereas the spooling
> into a local mailbox is p
also sprach Joseba Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.09.1251 +0200]:
> As long as nothing depends on whatever you patch, you can do it
> with no problem. And I don't think that anything depends on
> dovecot.
You just won't get security updates anymore.
--
martin; (greetings from th
Hi,
El Miércoles, 8 de Agosto de 2007 17:42, martin f krafft escribió:
> > Of course, you could patch Dovecot LDA. It is rather straight
> > forward.
>
> As a long-time Debian user, I'd really rather not patch anything. :)
As long as nothing depends on whatever you patch, you can do it with no
p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
As a long-time Debian user, I'd really rather not patch anything. :)
Um, I couldn't stand this policy while waiting for Sarge.
But yes, if dovecot's LDA would honour something like .forward
files, I'd b
also sprach Steffen Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.08.1458 +0200]:
> > until I discovered how limited sieve's vacation module is. Most
> > importantly: it's hardcoded to use the Return-Path of a message, but
> > in this very case, I need to actually use the address in the from
>
> What's the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
until I discovered how limited sieve's vacation module is. Most
importantly: it's hardcoded to use the Return-Path of a message, but
in this very case, I need to actually use the address in the from
What'
