On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 23:19 +0200, Ingo Thierack wrote:
> the two patches are made it.
>
> the imap process is now around 60-70%.
>
> And now are transfered around 8 -10 messages per second.
The next speedup would be to use some other method that uses MULTIAPPEND
IMAP extension. That makes Dovec
the two patches are made it.
the imap process is now around 60-70%.
And now are transfered around 8 -10 messages per second.
Thanks for you help.
Ingo
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 12:09 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 09:06 +0200, Ingo Thierack wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 12:09 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 09:06 +0200, Ingo Thierack wrote:
> > > Also see if maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes helps.
> > >
> > >
> > set both parameter, no speedup. Im now on message 48000 and it takes
> > around 5 seconds and more to transfer
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 09:06 +0200, Ingo Thierack wrote:
> > Also see if maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes helps.
> >
> >
> set both parameter, no speedup. Im now on message 48000 and it takes
> around 5 seconds and more to transfer one
> message.
What about after applying this patch:
http://hg.dov
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 10:29 +0200, Ingo Thierack wrote:
> What i now see, is, on large folder( 58000 messages and more) the load
> on the imap-process
> is very high, and slowdown the transferprocess.
> Is there something, I can do. Whats cause the high load ind the
> imap-process.
Is it actuall
