On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 23:24 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> > >> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > >>> doveadm multi [-A | -u wildcards]
> > >>> [ [...]]
..
> Ok, so how about "batch"?
>
> It reads a series of commands and collects them into
> one "batch job" which is then carried out.
Added this final
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.9.2012, at 8.28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> >> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>> doveadm multi [-A | -u wildcards]
> >>> [ [...]]
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >
> >> As command name I could also think of "doveadm sequence", which
> >> implies the commands being executed in ser
At 2PM +0300 on 24/09/12 you (Timo Sirainen) wrote:
> On 24.9.2012, at 14.44, A.L.E.C wrote:
>
> > next is "run" or "pipe", but what if you create global separator option
> > and detect multi-command syntax usage automatically without a keyword?
> >
> > Syntax for doveadm would be
> >
> > dovea
On 24.9.2012, at 14.44, A.L.E.C wrote:
> next is "run" or "pipe", but what if you create global separator option
> and detect multi-command syntax usage automatically without a keyword?
>
> Syntax for doveadm would be
>
> doveadm [-Dv] [-f formatter] [-s separator] [-A | -u wildcards ] command
>
On 09/22/2012 06:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.9.2012, at 11.23, A.L.E.C wrote:
>
>> On 09/20/2012 06:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> Thoughts? Any better name for the command than "multi"?
>>
>> How about 'execute' or 'exec'.
>
> v2.1.10 already has "dovecot exec" that does a different thi
On 21.9.2012, at 8.28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> doveadm multi [-A | -u wildcards] [>> string> [...]]
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>
>> As command name I could also think of "doveadm sequence", which
>> implies the commands being executed in serial order.
>
> Hmm. Maybe.
"sequen
On 21.9.2012, at 16.53, Steinar Bang wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen :
>
>> Thoughts?
>
> How about:
> a) Dropping into a command prompt where it's possible to give commands?
> b) Making it possible to feed commands through a pipe (ie reading lines
>from stdin)?
Both of these would require addi
On 21.9.2012, at 11.23, A.L.E.C wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 06:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Thoughts? Any better name for the command than "multi"?
>
> How about 'execute' or 'exec'.
v2.1.10 already has "dovecot exec" that does a different thing. So can't be
anything related to "exec"..
> Timo Sirainen :
> Thoughts?
How about:
a) Dropping into a command prompt where it's possible to give commands?
b) Making it possible to feed commands through a pipe (ie reading lines
from stdin)?
On 2012-09-21 10:23, A.L.E.C wrote:
On 09/20/2012 06:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Thoughts? Any better name for the command than "multi"?
How about 'execute' or 'exec'.
doveadm execall [...]
Regards,
Michael
On 09/20/2012 06:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Thoughts? Any better name for the command than "multi"?
How about 'execute' or 'exec'.
--
Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak
LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl]
Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net]
-
On 20.9.2012, at 22.17, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> doveadm multi [-A | -u wildcards] [> string> [...]]
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Would be nice if this also worked through doveadm director proxy
> and executes the command sequence on the correct backend host for
> each user.
Ye
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> doveadm multi [-A | -u wildcards] [ string> [...]]
>
> Thoughts?
Would be nice if this also worked through doveadm director proxy
and executes the command sequence on the correct backend host for
each user.
As command name I could also think of "doveadm sequence", which
13 matches
Mail list logo
