Re: [Dovecot] doveadm + dsync merging

2012-01-06 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 15:19 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote: > >> b) Don't have the dsync prefix: > >> > >> dsync mirror -> doveadm mirror > >> dsync backup -> doveadm backup > >> dsync server -> doveadm dsync-server (could be hidden from the doveadm > >> commands list) I did this now, with mirror -> sy

Re: [Dovecot] doveadm + dsync merging

2011-12-30 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 08:59:35PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: > > > Slightly different, but it would be good to have a persistently > running daemon which could operate both in server and client mode. > In server mode it would listen on a TCP socket. In client mode it > would accept source and targe

Re: [Dovecot] doveadm + dsync merging

2011-12-29 Thread Attila Nagy
Hi, On 12/29/2011 01:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: doveadm already supports some nice things, such as being able to remotely launch a doveadm command via TCP socket. It also supports executing a command for all users or to some specific users using a wildcard. dsync could use these features, so

Re: [Dovecot] doveadm + dsync merging

2011-12-29 Thread Pascal Volk
On 12/29/2011 01:53 PM Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Timo Sirainen : >> … >> a) Use "doveadm dsync" prefix, and otherwise keep the names same: >> >> dsync mirror -> doveadm dsync mirror >> dsync backup -> doveadm dsync backup >> dsync server -> doveadm dsync server (for running dsync remotely via

Re: [Dovecot] doveadm + dsync merging

2011-12-29 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Timo Sirainen : > doveadm already supports some nice things, such as being able to remotely > launch a doveadm command via TCP socket. It also supports executing a command > for all users or to some specific users using a wildcard. dsync could use > these features, so I merged dsync and dovead