On 2009-12-29, Florian Effenberger (flo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> ok, thanks for the insight! I guess it's really the best choice to
> just update to a recent system and see if things work. ;-)
Just be sure to read the update notes on the wiki carefully:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading
> Thanks
Hi Charles,
>> I guess that requires recompilation of the package?
>
> I don't think so, but maybe the old 1.0rc15 only supported dnotify?
>
> Anyway, inotify/dnotify is not part of dovecot, it is part of the linux
> kernel (2.6.13+) - dovecot only makes USE of it, so it will work with
> either.
>
On 2009-12-29 7:23 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>>> Seems I am lucky then:
>>> Build options: ioloop=poll notify=dnotify
>> dnotify is deprecated (and buggy)... use inotify on the server instead.
> I guess that requires recompilation of the package?
I don't think so, but maybe the old 1.0rc15 o
>> Seems I am lucky then:
>> Build options: ioloop=poll notify=dnotify
>
> dnotify is deprecated (and buggy)... use inotify on the server instead.
I guess that requires recompilation of the package?
On 2009-12-29, Florian Effenberger (flo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Seems I am lucky then:
> Build options: ioloop=poll notify=dnotify
dnotify is deprecated (and buggy)... use inotify on the server instead.
--
Best regards,
Charles
Hi Timo,
> Which v1.0? (Which one's Debian 4.0? :) I wish Debian used Ubuntu-style
> year+month numbers as versions. The only Debian versions I remember are
> stable, testing and unstable..)
:-) It's pretty old, dovecot --version returns 1.0.rc15
> Anyway, I don't think there have been any act
Hi Tobi,
> I tested it with Dovecot 1.1.6 and Thunderbird 3. The STATUS command
> seems to be returned correctly.
thanks a lot! Guess I'll give it a try on a new machine or with a
backport. Currently in a "never touch a running system" mood,
especially between the years when I have vacation :-)
On 28.12.2009, at 8.30, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> According to
> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Checking_for_new_messages_in_other_folders_-_Thunderbird
> it should be sufficient to enable one setting -- given that the IMAP
> server returns the STATUS command correctly. I still run Dovecot 1.0
> (f
Am 28.12.2009 16:14, schrieb Florian Effenberger:
> Hi Tobias,
>
>
>> This might be help you...
>> **quote**
>> If Thunderbird doesn't recognize that a folder contains unread messages try
>> setting mail.imap.use_status_for_biff true. It causes Thunderbird to
>> explicitly select each folder to
Hi Tobias,
> * "Dovecot is standards compliant. Dovecot v1.1 passes all IMAP server
> standard compliancy
> tests while most other servers fail many of them."
[..]
>
> Hope, this answers your question. Maybe you should use a recent version of
> Dovecot (stable is 1.2.9)
> and not v1.0
indeed, I
Am 28.12.2009 um 16:14 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
> Hi Tobias,
>
>> This might be help you...
>> **quote**
>> If Thunderbird doesn't recognize that a folder contains unread messages try
>> setting mail.imap.use_status_for_biff true. It causes Thunderbird to
>> explicitly select each folder to
Hi Tobias,
> This might be help you...
> **quote**
> If Thunderbird doesn't recognize that a folder contains unread messages try
> setting mail.imap.use_status_for_biff true. It causes Thunderbird to
> explicitly select each folder to update the message summaries, rather than
> using the STATUS co
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:30:14 +0100, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use Thunderbird as IMAP client and do a lot of server-side filtering
> with Sieve scripts. To be notified of new mails, I want to check all
> folders (a lot of them...) at once for new mails, and not only the
> inbox.
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
