Perhaps the wiki should also reference the sieve vacation draft as
well as RFC3834 (which is also referenced by the vacation draft), and
state how it does or does not conform to it.
Good idea...
* The envelope sender and envelope recipient are the same
Where does that rule come from, I wo
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 12:32:44PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Hi,
I don't know much about the sieve implementation used by dovecot LDA,
so these are just generic remarks.
>
> Since I will soon be attempting to get this working on one of my
> client's systems, I posed a question on the post
These certainly do look like reasonable suggestions. I am going to be
looking at exactly the vacation handling code over the next few days and
already suspect that I need to make some changes. I'll certainly look at
adding the suggested tests but see below.
>
CM> The original text (prefixe
> "CM" == Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CM> The only response I got did seem to have a few very good
CM> suggestions for additional conditions to test for, so I'm posting
CM> the response here to see if they can be incorporated (I'm not a
CM> coder or I'd attempt i
