I actually meant that you should do both. But no, 1) shouldn't cause
problems.
Or actually looking at the code, it already tries to detect duplicate
hard links and unlinks one of them. You could change the code from:
if (st1.st_ino == st2.st_ino &&
CMP_DEV_T(st1.st_dev, st2.s
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:22 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> > I guess the easiest solution would be to:
> >
> > 1) Remove the duplicate detection/fixing code from Dovecot code.
> > 2) Create a script that resolves duplicates by deleting one of them.
>
> So if I do #1 , do you see this causing any ot
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:12 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
Yes that depends on DNS updating. So is there not way to avoid this
Duplication problem if you need to do an rsync 2x?
Not really. The move should preferably be atomic.. With Dovecot v2.0
there's
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:12 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> Yes that depends on DNS updating. So is there not way to avoid this
> Duplication problem if you need to do an rsync 2x?
Not really. The move should preferably be atomic.. With Dovecot v2.0
there's dsync utility, which would pretty much do
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:04 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
Heres a litle bit of background on what we are doing and maybe if you have
time you can let me know what you think the best way of doing this would
be. When we move users to dovecot servers, we first create a new user on
the destination mach
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:04 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> Heres a litle bit of background on what we are doing and maybe if you have
> time you can let me know what you think the best way of doing this would
> be. When we move users to dovecot servers, we first create a new user on
> the destina
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:42 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
Is there a way to disable this feature? Seems to be causing more harm then
good right now. Without getting into too much details it is fixing the
duplcates but it does not remove the old file, and the new file it creates
is not marked as rea
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:42 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> Is there a way to disable this feature? Seems to be causing more harm then
> good right now. Without getting into too much details it is fixing the
> duplcates but it does not remove the old file, and the new file it creates
> is not mark
