On S 13 Dec, 2008, at 14:56 , Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
you put in so many negatives there that the m
On Dec 13, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a
firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said "_ON_ my mail server". he didn't say that he doesn't have a
firewall between the mail server and the jungle
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:07 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/13/2008, mouss (mo...@netoyen.net) wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a
firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said "_ON_ my mail server". he didn't say that he doesn't have
On 12/13/2008, mouss (mo...@netoyen.net) wrote:
>> Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
>>
>> Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
> He said "_ON_ my mail server". he didn't say that he doesn't have a
> firewall between the mail server and the jun
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
>> and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
>
> Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
>
> Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
>
He said "
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
> and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
> Hoards of little prepubescent miscreants won't stop hammering on my
> pop3 port and it's driving me bananas.
Although I'm not necessarily arguing against such a feature being
integrated directly into dovecot, you can fix you're problem n
On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:13 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
By having fail2ban manipulate the routing table a-la "route add
"?
route add *host* reject
yes, something like that.
Understood. I sorta like this idea. I will give i
* Dave McGuire :
>> You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
>
> By having fail2ban manipulate the routing table a-la "route add "?
route add *host* reject
yes, something like that.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de
Postfix -
On Dec 13, 2008, at 2:44 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion, but no, that doesn't work for me.
I'm not
running a Linux box, I'm running Solaris...
It runs on Solaris.
and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
You don't have to, you could simp
* Dave McGuire :
> Thank you for the suggestion, but no, that doesn't work for me. I'm not
> running a Linux box, I'm running Solaris...
It runs on Solaris.
> and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
--
On Dec 13, 2008, at 12:43 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
Timo, if I may make a request...Unless 1.2 will be released soon,
would you please also look into the possibility of integrating the
"back
off after failed auth attempts" feature into the 1.1 code base? I
need
that badly here, to the point t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave McGuire said the following on 13/12/08 06:41:
> Timo, if I may make a request...Unless 1.2 will be released soon,
> would you please also look into the possibility of integrating the "back
> off after failed auth attempts" feature into the 1.1
On Dec 13, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hello Dovecot developers,
Apple has made and tested significant changes to Dovecot v1.1 and now
is ready to contribute them back to your open source project. The
changes include:
Sounds great!
Yes it does. Thanks, Apple!
I could contri
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:24 -0600, Mike Abbott wrote:
> Hello Dovecot developers,
>
> Apple has made and tested significant changes to Dovecot v1.1 and now
> is ready to contribute them back to your open source project. The
> changes include:
Sounds great!
> I could contribute these as one
amazing. we just finished hacking apple-user-mailattribute into our
dovecot ldap conf last month. do you have any sample confs posted?
our OD usage atm is very crude...
JL
On Dec 12, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
Hello Dovecot developers,
Apple has made and tested significant ch
three cheers to see apple working on this.
hopefully we will see it on 10.6 os x server
looking forward to it.
if there is any tutorial on installing it in conjunction 10.5 server
it would be greatly appreciated.
rashantha de silva
On Dec 12, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
Hello Do
Very cool to see Apple contribute to dovecot!
Cor
18 matches
Mail list logo
