On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:07 -0800, papi mac wrote:
> I tried this idea and it seems to work well. I ran into a problem that is
> probably Fedora related. The delivery failed because of a permission problem
> in /var/spool/mail. The users are not able to create the dotlock files there
> and so th
I tried this idea and it seems to work well. I ran into a problem that is
probably Fedora related. The delivery failed because of a permission problem in
/var/spool/mail. The users are not able to create the dotlock files there and
so the error message is:
deliver(admin): open(/var/mail/.temp.m
I already have a procmail rule in each user's directory that delivers
"X-Spam-Status: Yes" email to a "spam-mail" folder. and the others to the inbox
(specified in $DEFAULT) Assuming I did not want spam-mail under quota control I
suppose I would have to add a line at the end something like this
Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
>
>> You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for
>> delivery? If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like?
>
> Right, that's what I mean -
>
> at the end of the default procmail rules (like in /et
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for
delivery? If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like?
Right, that's what I mean -
at the end of the default procmail rules (like in /etc/procmailrc), pipe
the message to d
You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for delivery?
If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like?
Thanks.
Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
> I have Fedora 7 from a standard installation running sendmail, procm
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
I have Fedora 7 from a standard installation running sendmail, procmail
and dovecot 1.0 installed on a single partition. I now need to set up
mail quotas for most of the users but not all. Just protecting
/var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME is probably good enough for