Re: [Dovecot] Sendmail, procmail, dovecot and quota

2008-01-09 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:07 -0800, papi mac wrote: > I tried this idea and it seems to work well. I ran into a problem that is > probably Fedora related. The delivery failed because of a permission problem > in /var/spool/mail. The users are not able to create the dotlock files there > and so th

Re: [Dovecot] Sendmail, procmail, dovecot and quota

2008-01-09 Thread papi mac
I tried this idea and it seems to work well. I ran into a problem that is probably Fedora related. The delivery failed because of a permission problem in /var/spool/mail. The users are not able to create the dotlock files there and so the error message is: deliver(admin): open(/var/mail/.temp.m

Re: [Dovecot] Sendmail, procmail, dovecot and quota

2008-01-08 Thread papi mac
I already have a procmail rule in each user's directory that delivers "X-Spam-Status: Yes" email to a "spam-mail" folder. and the others to the inbox (specified in $DEFAULT) Assuming I did not want spam-mail under quota control I suppose I would have to add a line at the end something like this

Re: [Dovecot] Sendmail, procmail, dovecot and quota

2008-01-08 Thread David Reid
Asheesh Laroia wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote: > >> You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for >> delivery? If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like? > > Right, that's what I mean - > > at the end of the default procmail rules (like in /et

Re: [Dovecot] Sendmail, procmail, dovecot and quota

2008-01-08 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote: You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for delivery? If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like? Right, that's what I mean - at the end of the default procmail rules (like in /etc/procmailrc), pipe the message to d

Re: [Dovecot] Sendmail, procmail, dovecot and quota

2008-01-08 Thread papi mac
You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for delivery? If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like? Thanks. Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote: > I have Fedora 7 from a standard installation running sendmail, procm

Re: [Dovecot] Sendmail, procmail, dovecot and quota

2008-01-08 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote: I have Fedora 7 from a standard installation running sendmail, procmail and dovecot 1.0 installed on a single partition. I now need to set up mail quotas for most of the users but not all. Just protecting /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME is probably good enough for