On 15/dic/2009, at 20.43, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 20:53 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Andre wrote:
>>
>>> Yesterday I was testing support for zlib, for compressed messages, to set
>>> up a new namespace for old mails and I read that it is safe
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 20:53 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Andre wrote:
>
> > Yesterday I was testing support for zlib, for compressed messages, to set
> > up a new namespace for old mails and I read that it is safe to compress
> > only mails that have the field “S=XX
On Dec 11, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Andre wrote:
> Yesterday I was testing support for zlib, for compressed messages, to set up
> a new namespace for old mails and I read that it is safe to compress only
> mails that have the field “S=XXX” in their name (XXX being the original size
> of message) and t
