Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-21 Thread Steve Campbell
Quoting Joseph Tam : > > Steve Campbell writes: > > > > This was piped into a script that Email'd users about the changes > > > that was going to happen, what they would expect to see, and a > > > FAQ on how to set up a mail client correctly. > > > > Here, I'm not sure what should

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-21 Thread Joseph Tam
Steve Campbell writes: > This was piped into a script that Email'd users about the changes > that was going to happen, what they would expect to see, and a > FAQ on how to set up a mail client correctly. Here, I'm not sure what should be done. The users with the secondary folders

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-21 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 21.2.2012, at 14.19, Steve Campbell wrote: > I'm still not sure whether I should be seeing .subscriptions or > mail/subscriptions anywhere and whether Dovecot will use the .mailboxlist > that exists. The wiki suggests that I need to recompile Dovecot to continue > using .mailboxlist. This is

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-21 Thread Steve Campbell
On 2/20/2012 7:25 PM, Joseph Tam wrote: Steve Campbell wrote: The more I read about all of this, the more I'm thinking about moving to maildir format. My switchover this weekend is full of holes due to the way user's imap folders were laid out. Some had folders in their home directory and

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-21 Thread Steve Campbell
On 2/20/2012 4:58 PM, Jim Lawson wrote: On 2/20/12 3:36 PM, Steve Campbell wrote: Thanks for that input. I still think I'm missing something since I too used the compatibility link that you pointed to. Only thing is that proceeding those namespaces, I used the first example of: namespace

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-20 Thread Joseph Tam
Steve Campbell wrote: The more I read about all of this, the more I'm thinking about moving to maildir format. My switchover this weekend is full of holes due to the way user's imap folders were laid out. Some had folders in their home directory and others might have folders in their /home/ma

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-20 Thread Jim Lawson
On 2/20/12 1:10 PM, Steve Campbell wrote: The more I read about all of this, the more I'm thinking about moving to maildir format. My switchover this weekend is full of holes due to the way user's imap folders were laid out. Some had folders in their home directory and others might have folders

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-02-20 1:34 PM, Steve Campbell wrote: On 2/20/2012 1:28 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-02-20 1:10 PM, Steve Campbell wrote: Our webmail is configured to read the inbox from /var/spool/mail and their imap folders from /home or /home/mail. I can't help with your specific problem,

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-20 Thread Steve Campbell
On 2/20/2012 1:28 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-02-20 1:10 PM, Steve Campbell wrote: Our webmail is configured to read the inbox from /var/spool/mail and their imap folders from /home or /home/mail. I can't help with your specific problem, but I do know that having mail stored directly

Re: [Dovecot] Questions still about a uw-imap -> dovecot conversion

2012-02-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-02-20 1:10 PM, Steve Campbell wrote: Our webmail is configured to read the inbox from /var/spool/mail and their imap folders from /home or /home/mail. I can't help with your specific problem, but I do know that having mail stored directly in /home will cause problems - you will need t