Mhm, thanks for the answer. I wanted to upgrade to 2.1 anyway because of the
LMTP.
t.
Urban Loesch-2 wrote:
>
> Same here on 2.0.x.
> But I think this is because it's only implemented for IMAP.
>
> See e-mail from Timo 2 days ago:
>
> ...
>
> Subject: Proxying improvements in v2.1.2
>
> I
Mhm, thanks for the answer. I wanted to upgrade to 2.1 anyway because of the
LMTP.
t.
Urban Loesch-2 wrote:
>
> Same here on 2.0.x.
> But I think this is because it's only implemented for IMAP.
>
> See e-mail from Timo 2 days ago:
>
> ...
>
> Subject: Proxying improvements in v2.1.2
>
> I
Same here on 2.0.x.
But I think this is because it's only implemented for IMAP.
See e-mail from Timo 2 days ago:
...
Subject: Proxying improvements in v2.1.2
I just committed a couple of features that will make life easier for some types
of proxying setups:
1. IMAP proxying has already for a
