* Timo Sirainen :
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:51 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > XLIST seems to be pretty proprietary. Have you had a look at LIST-EXTENDED
> > instead?
>
> See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg/current/msg00208.html
> thread, especially
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-arc
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:51 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> XLIST seems to be pretty proprietary. Have you had a look at LIST-EXTENDED
> instead?
See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg/current/msg00208.html
thread, especially
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg/current/msg00212.h
Timo,
* Rob Middleton :
> On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client sho
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Robert Schetterer :
but with autocreate and global sieve rules you can implement a pseudo
standart
i use tbs one and configure horde/imp like tb does it, in my meaning
big players have no intension bring up even a pseudo standart
cause they
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
Worse than this, most IMAP clients auto-
* Robert Schetterer :
> >> but with autocreate and global sieve rules you can implement a pseudo
> >> standart
> >> i use tbs one and configure horde/imp like tb does it, in my meaning
> >> big players have no intension bring up even a pseudo standart
> >> cause they want users to use their own mai
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:33:21PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Axel Thimm schrieb:
> > Given than you seem to bless Apple Mail folder structures it makes it
> > a good candidate to try to push as a standard for others to
> > copy. Maybe there could be example setups/configs shipped with
* Ed W :
> Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
>>
>> Worse than this,
* Rob Middleton :
> On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
> >message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
> >common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should han
Axel Thimm schrieb:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>
>>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
On 26/09/2009 6:40 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a so
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:40:21AM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> >
> >> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Has anyone seen an app
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
from a users
poi
Rob Middleton schrieb:
> On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with
>> typical
>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least
>> there's no
>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Robert Schetterer :
>> Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
>>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
>>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
>>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how
On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
XLIST may de
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Charles Marcus :
>> On 9/25/2009, Stefan Förster (cite+dovecot-us...@incertum.net) wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a
users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
>>> Tried
* Stefan Förster :
> * Patrick Ben Koetter :
> > * Timo Sirainen :
> >> No. And one of the first commands they typically do is LIST. So
> >> there are no good ways to solve this.
> >
> > I suspected that.
> >
> > Would it be possible to identify a client by the folders it tries to
> > subscribe
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> * Timo Sirainen :
>> No. And one of the first commands they typically do is LIST. So
>> there are no good ways to solve this.
>
> I suspected that.
>
> Would it be possible to identify a client by the folders it tries to subscribe
> to?
You could, of course, have a list
* Robert Schetterer :
> Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> > It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
> > message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
> > common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle
> > this.
* Timo Sirainen :
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> >Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >>>Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the
> >>>problem from a users
> >>>point of view? A server side alias list that maps
* Charles Marcus :
> On 9/25/2009, Stefan Förster (cite+dovecot-us...@incertum.net) wrote:
> >> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a
> >> users
> >> point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
>
> > Tried that, didn't work out that g
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
>
> Worse than this, most IMAP cli
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
from a users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server
standard?
Symlinks maybe
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from
a users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
Symlinks maybe? Or something similar done internally. The main p
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
from a users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server
standard?
Symlinks maybe? Or something similar done internally. The main problem
would anywa
On 9/25/2009, Stefan Förster (cite+dovecot-us...@incertum.net) wrote:
>> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a
>> users
>> point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
> Tried that, didn't work out that great (users got confused by 12
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a users
> point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
Tried that, didn't work out that great (users got confused by 12
dozillion "sent" folders).
As for know, I auto-subscr
28 matches
Mail list logo
