On 7/24/2009 1:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
mail_location: maildir:/home/data/Profiles/OfflineIMAP/root:LAYOUT=fs
>>> Append :INBOX=/home/data/Profiles/OfflineIMAP/root
>> Hey, thanks, worked perfectly. I just rechecked the wiki, and this is
>> not mentioned at all, should it be added? The on
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:45 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> You seem to be a bit too much obsessed over Maildir++ :) Maildir++ is
> just Courier IMAP's way of storing Maildir folders, which was adopted
> by a few other programs. Other programs use more human-understandable
> way (LAYOUT=fs).
On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:34 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:28 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nope. Maildir++ is basically the dot-subfoldering and also Maildir++
quota file. Evolution uses neither.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up. So this LAYOUT=fs is simply for the
Maildir spec, not
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:28 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Nope. Maildir++ is basically the dot-subfoldering and also Maildir++
> quota file. Evolution uses neither.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up. So this LAYOUT=fs is simply for the
Maildir spec, not Maildir++? Or is it some amalgamation that d
On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:14 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You're using fs layout, not Maildir++ layout.
Well, I'm obviously much less well-informed on these matters, but from
my POV I was using Evolution (probably one of the more popular
maildir-cap
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:14 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> You're using fs layout, not Maildir++ layout.
Well, I'm obviously much less well-informed on these matters, but from
my POV I was using Evolution (probably one of the more popular
maildir-capable GUI app), and this is the maildir format it
On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Well, this wasn't really intentional.. LAYOUT=fs hasn't really been
used much. I'm beginning to think maybe I should change this to be
the
default with it too.
I guess offlineimap->dovecot (serving IMAP)->mail client IS a bit of a
corner case.
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 01:47 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:35 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 01:25 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >>
> >>> Anyway, it all works spiffingly well, except that I can't see my
> >
On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:35 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 01:25 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Anyway, it all works spiffingly well, except that I can't see my
inbox
at all. What happens is that attempting to subscribe to Inbox will
creat
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 01:25 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> > Anyway, it all works spiffingly well, except that I can't see my inbox
> > at all. What happens is that attempting to subscribe to Inbox will
> > create an INBOX folder in the root folder,
On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Anyway, it all works spiffingly well, except that I can't see my inbox
at all. What happens is that attempting to subscribe to Inbox will
create an INBOX folder in the root folder, which is (of course) empty,
so I see an empty folder.
mail_location:
11 matches
Mail list logo
