On 10/7/2012 7:11 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I don't think dovecot.index file is much of a problem. With 1M mails it
> usually only takes something like 8-32 MB of memory depending on what mailbox
> format is used. dovecot.index.log file doesn't depend on the mailbox size at
> all. The main pro
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 03:11 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The 3. part is what I like changing the least. An alternative solution
> would be to just not map the entire cache file into memory all at
> once. The code was actually originally designed to do just that, but
> munmap()ing + mmap()ing agai
On 7.10.2012, at 0.32, Peer Heinlein wrote:
> Several times we already had the problems, that accounts with more the
> 1.3 or 1.7 billion e-mails in one folder run out-of-memory, even if
> vsize_limit of 750 MB is set.
>
> In this case, the lmtpd-process haven't been able to allocate more
> memor
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 23:32:56 +0200, Peer Heinlein said:
>
> Several times we already had the problems, that accounts with more the
> 1.3 or 1.7 billion e-mails in one folder run out-of-memory, even if
> vsize_limit of 750 MB is set.
>
> In this case, the lmtpd-process haven't been able to allocat
