On Wednesday 08 September 2010 16:11:43 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 14:00 +0200, Rainer Frey wrote:
> > > The problem is that all logging goes through log process, which
> > > currently only supports a single logging destination. But .. I think
> > > you can make lmtp processes byp
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 14:00 +0200, Rainer Frey wrote:
> > The problem is that all logging goes through log process, which
> > currently only supports a single logging destination. But .. I think you
> > can make lmtp processes bypass log process by setting:
> >
> > service lmtp {
> > executable
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 16:21:35 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:23 +0200, Rainer Frey wrote:
> > protocol lmtp {
> >
> > syslog_facility = mail
> >
> > }
> >
> > but this has no effect, LMTP logs to local0. Is this supposed to work, or
> > is this not implemented at
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 09:23 +0200, Rainer Frey wrote:
> protocol lmtp {
> syslog_facility = mail
> }
>
> but this has no effect, LMTP logs to local0. Is this supposed to work, or is
> this not implemented at all? If not, is using a logfile in main config, but
> syslog in lmtp supported?
