On 4/9/2009 11:23 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
> IMHO, every version of Dovecot has been the best version ever! Until the next
> one comes out...
Well, ok, ya got me there... ;)
on 4-9-2009 8:10 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
> On 4/9/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
>>> Or should I go ahead and plan on doing this via cron as suggested?
>
>> It's not really necessary to do it via cron either, although users
>> may then have to wait a bit longer if they hav
On 4/9/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
>> Or should I go ahead and plan on doing this via cron as suggested?
> It's not really necessary to do it via cron either, although users
> may then have to wait a bit longer if they have received a lot of new
> mail.
Hmmm... you're probably right.
On Apr 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 4/8/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
For message body indexing there are a couple of choices:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
On this page it says that the indexes are not updated with deliver and
suggests using a cron job...
I
On 4/8/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> For message body indexing there are a couple of choices:
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
On this page it says that the indexes are not updated with deliver and
suggests using a cron job...
Is this planned to be added anytime soon (1.2? 1.3?)
Timo Sirainen writes:
Hi Timo,
> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 21:09 +0200, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>> I use a local dovecot server which is synchronized with my two imap
>> accounts using OfflineIMAP. This works very nice and is highly
>> usable.
>>
>> But one thing I'd like to improve is the slow IMAP s
Nevermind, stupid question. I found it on the squat page. ;)
David Halik wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
For message body indexing there are a couple of choices:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
Just curious, what is the average disk usage for FTS? I know it's
usually around 10-15% of an
Timo Sirainen wrote:
For message body indexing there are a couple of choices:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
Just curious, what is the average disk usage for FTS? I know it's
usually around 10-15% of an inbox for standard indexing. I'm assuming
FTS is considerably more.
--
=
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 21:09 +0200, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> I use a local dovecot server which is synchronized with my two imap
> accounts using OfflineIMAP. This works very nice and is highly usable.
>
> But one thing I'd like to improve is the slow IMAP search. When I
> search for a string in the
