> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:49:49 +0200
> From: Timo Sirainen
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] IMAP SPECIAL-USE extension
>
> I did this: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/9b9a206395f7
Just to add to the confusion:
Pine/Alpine uses "sent-mail"
:(
On 12/07/2011 08:56 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.12.2011, at 17.45, Willie Gillespie wrote:
Outlook 2010 lets you select a mailbox for Trash and Sent (version 2007 only
lets you select a mailbox for Sent messages).
Outlook default names for Trash is "Deleted Items" (as someone pointed out) an
On 7.12.2011, at 17.45, Willie Gillespie wrote:
> Outlook 2010 lets you select a mailbox for Trash and Sent (version 2007 only
> lets you select a mailbox for Sent messages).
> Outlook default names for Trash is "Deleted Items" (as someone pointed out)
> and for junk is "Junk E-mail".
And the d
On 12/06/2011 03:13 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 17:12 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The mailbox names require a namespace prefix, so if you use e.g. "INBOX."
prefix you'll need to use:
I changed these so that they are inside namespace {} section and don't
require namespace
On 2011-12-07 8:55 AM, Pascal Volk
wrote:
On 12/07/2011 02:28 PM Arne K. Haaje wrote:
> Thunderbird also use a Templates folder.
Yes, I also noticed that. But
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154#section-2 doesn't mention a mailbox
for templates.
Nevertheless, it is very handy functionality.
Am 07.12.2011 15:35, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Pascal Volk :
>> On 12/07/2011 02:28 PM Arne K. Haaje wrote:
>>> Thunderbird also use a Templates folder.
>>
>> Yes, I also noticed that. But
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154#section-2 doesn't mention a mailbox
>> for templates.
>
> IIRC I
* Pascal Volk :
> On 12/07/2011 02:28 PM Arne K. Haaje wrote:
> > Thunderbird also use a Templates folder.
>
> Yes, I also noticed that. But
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154#section-2 doesn't mention a mailbox
> for templates.
IIRC IETF allows to register new SPECIAL-USE mailboxes. 'templates
On 12/07/2011 02:28 PM Arne K. Haaje wrote:
> Thunderbird also use a Templates folder.
Yes, I also noticed that. But
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154#section-2 doesn't mention a mailbox
for templates.
Regards,
Pascal
--
The trapper recommends today: face1e55.1134...@localdomain.org
Tirsdag 6. desember 2011 14.58.04 skrev WJCarpenter:
> > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 17:12 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > I'm anyway now wondering what the defaults should be? Could someone
> > check what these defaults are for Outlook and any other clients you
> >
> > have:
> > * "Drafts" is us
On 2011-12-06 5:13 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
* "Trash" is used by all clients
Outlook uses 'Deleted Items', not 'Trash'...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Am 07.12.2011 00:30, schrieb Simon Brereton:
> On 6 December 2011 18:14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 18:02 -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>>> * "Sent" is used by Thunderbird, Evolution
>>> * "Sent Messages" is used by Apple Mail
>>>
>>> So I'm mainly wondering abo
Am 06.12.2011 23:48, schrieb Michael M Slusarz:
> Quoting Timo Sirainen :
>
>> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 23:26 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>>> > I'm anyway now wondering what the defaults should be? Could someone
>>> > check what these defaults are for Outlook and any other clients you
>>> > hav
On 6 December 2011 18:14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 18:02 -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> >>> > * "Sent" is used by Thunderbird, Evolution
>> >>> > * "Sent Messages" is used by Apple Mail
>> >>> >
>> >>> > So I'm mainly wondering about "Sent" vs. "Sent Messages".
>> >
>> >
>>
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 18:02 -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
> >>> > * "Sent" is used by Thunderbird, Evolution
> >>> > * "Sent Messages" is used by Apple Mail
> >>> >
> >>> > So I'm mainly wondering about "Sent" vs. "Sent Messages".
> >
> >
> > IIRC, at least some versions of Exchange use(d) "Sent I
On 6 December 2011 17:48, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> Quoting Timo Sirainen :
>
>> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 23:26 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm anyway now wondering what the defaults should be? Could someone
>>> > check what these defaults are for Outlook and any other clients you
>>
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 17:12 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'm anyway now wondering what the defaults should be? Could someone
check what these defaults are for Outlook and any other clients you
have:
* "Drafts" is used by all clients
* "Trash" is used by all clients
* "Junk" is used by all
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 00:35 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Yeah, just some defaults that most people could use without changes.
> Although maybe if all of them were set with autocreate=no there could be
> alternatives added. Like:
>
> mailbox Sent {
> special_use = \Sent
> }
> mailbox "Sent Messa
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 23:26 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> I'm anyway now wondering what the defaults should be? Could someone
> check what these defaults are for Outlook and any other clients you
> have:
>
> * "Drafts" is used by all clients
> * "Trash" is used b
* Michael M Slusarz :
> The combination of the original author's comment, and your response
> which did not seem to disagree with him at all, made it ambiguous at
> best whether you were referring to localized mailbox names being
> stored on the server or being translated on the client. Looking
>
Quoting Patrick Ben Koetter :
* Michael M Slusarz :
Quoting Patrick Ben Koetter :
>* A.L.E.C :
>>On 06.12.2011 13:43, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>>
>>> From my understanding RFC 6154 serves to flag some IMAP
>>mailboxes in order to
>>> indicate they should be used for special use e.g. as trash
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 23:26 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > I'm anyway now wondering what the defaults should be? Could someone
> > check what these defaults are for Outlook and any other clients you
> > have:
> >
> > * "Drafts" is used by all clients
> > * "Trash" is used by all clients
>
* Michael M Slusarz :
> Quoting Patrick Ben Koetter :
>
> >* A.L.E.C :
> >>On 06.12.2011 13:43, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >>
> >>> From my understanding RFC 6154 serves to flag some IMAP
> >>mailboxes in order to
> >>> indicate they should be used for special use e.g. as trash folder etc.
> >>>
Quoting Patrick Ben Koetter :
* A.L.E.C :
On 06.12.2011 13:43, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> From my understanding RFC 6154 serves to flag some IMAP mailboxes
in order to
> indicate they should be used for special use e.g. as trash folder etc.
>
> I fail to see how RFC 6154 would help displa
* Timo Sirainen :
> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 17:12 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > The mailbox names require a namespace prefix, so if you use e.g. "INBOX."
> > prefix you'll need to use:
>
> I changed these so that they are inside namespace {} section and don't
> require namespace prefix in the
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 17:12 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The mailbox names require a namespace prefix, so if you use e.g. "INBOX."
> prefix you'll need to use:
I changed these so that they are inside namespace {} section and don't
require namespace prefix in the name. That way I can include com
Yep, I only meant it in the crudest of forms. I'm sure defining the
correct syntax will be the hard part.
Quoting Stephan Bosch :
Op 6-12-2011 16:00, Patrick Domack schreef:
Guess the next nice step would be to get sieve scripts to be able
to use the aliased special use folders. So you can
Op 6-12-2011 16:00, Patrick Domack schreef:
Guess the next nice step would be to get sieve scripts to be able to
use the aliased special use folders. So you can just say, fileinto \Spam;
Hmm, yeah. This will require some standardization efforts though.
Your example is a bit problematic:
- Fi
Guess the next nice step would be to get sieve scripts to be able to
use the aliased special use folders. So you can just say, fileinto
\Spam;
Quoting Patrick Ben Koetter :
* A.L.E.C :
On 06.12.2011 13:43, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> From my understanding RFC 6154 serves to flag some IMAP m
* A.L.E.C :
> On 06.12.2011 13:43, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > From my understanding RFC 6154 serves to flag some IMAP mailboxes in order
> > to
> > indicate they should be used for special use e.g. as trash folder etc.
> >
> > I fail to see how RFC 6154 would help displaying localized mail
On 06.12.2011 13:43, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> From my understanding RFC 6154 serves to flag some IMAP mailboxes in order to
> indicate they should be used for special use e.g. as trash folder etc.
>
> I fail to see how RFC 6154 would help displaying localized mailbox names.
Ok. It will not h
* A.L.E.C :
> On 06.12.2011 11:29, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> >> Are there any plans to support RFC5464 SETMETADATA, so individual
> >> users can name their "\Trash" folder "Skraldspand" in danish or what
> >> ever they prefer?
>
> Now I see in the hg that Timo doesn't implemented this nor
>
On 06.12.2011 11:29, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> Are there any plans to support RFC5464 SETMETADATA, so individual
>> users can name their "\Trash" folder "Skraldspand" in danish or what
>> ever they prefer?
Now I see in the hg that Timo doesn't implemented this nor
CREATE-SPECIAL-USE. So, it's
Am 06.12.2011 10:39, schrieb Peter Mogensen:
> On 2011-12-02 22:22, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org wrote:
> > It's implemented now in dovecot-2.1 hg. It also deprecates autocreate
> > plugin (but it still works the old way). The idea is that you can now
> > do e.g.:
> >
> > mailbox Trash {
> > aut
On 2011-12-02 22:22, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org wrote:
> It's implemented now in dovecot-2.1 hg. It also deprecates autocreate
> plugin (but it still works the old way). The idea is that you can now
> do e.g.:
>
> mailbox Trash {
> auto = no
> special_use = \Trash
> }
> ...
This is great Tim
On 2011-12-02 16:12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It's implemented now in dovecot-2.1 hg. It also deprecates autocreate plugin
> (but it still works the old way). The idea is that you can now do e.g.:
> mailbox Spam {
> auto = create # autocreate, but don't autosubscribe
> special_use = \Junk
This
35 matches
Mail list logo
