On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 23:02 -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
> > Have you thought about enabling Squat indexes? I'd like to know how much
> > it would affect I/O and CPU usage in larger installations. CPU grows
> > (maybe a lot) but searches should be faster and use very little I/O as a
> > result.
>
> By
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 11:23 -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> > The impact has been severe! Even with NFS-stored indexes, our netapp is
> > seeing 1/6th of the NFS ops per second, and its CPU utilization is now at
> > 1/3rd previous levels.
>
> Have you th
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 11:23 -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
> The impact has been severe! Even with NFS-stored indexes, our netapp is
> seeing 1/6th of the NFS ops per second, and its CPU utilization is now at
> 1/3rd previous levels.
Have you thought about enabling Squat indexes? I'd like to know how
Words by Andy Dills [Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:23:08AM -0500]:
>
> So, to follow up to my previous thread, we just successfully migrated our
> NFS-based mail cluster from qmail pop, courier imap, and bincimap to
> dovecot 1.1rc1.
>
> Overall the transition was very smooth, the only unexpected adj
