On 1/6/2014 11:28 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 1/6/2014 12:27 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-06 3:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I want to user dovecot deliver into a folder that is not at the
root lev
Steffen Kaiser skrev den 2014-01-07 08:28:
separator = .
- -m shared.sub1.sub2.sub3
When I used Dovecot LDA, the first variant worked.
is separator not a glue here ? :)
i think separator = / is a very very bad idea
Marc Perkel skrev den 2014-01-06 21:33:
when specifying the mailbox - how do you specify a subfolder? Do you
use a / separator?
try create a folder in webmail, then see how its done in filesystem
later, is this clear now ?
seperate chars is imho not hardcoded, thats why i answer as above
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 1/6/2014 12:27 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-06 3:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I want to user dovecot deliver into a folder that is not at the root
level - how do I do that? How do I specify a fold
On 2014-01-06 3:33 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 1/6/2014 12:27 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-06 3:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I want to user dovecot deliver into a folder that is not at the
root level - how do I do that? How do I specify a folder in a folder?
For *all* messages? Or f
On 1/6/2014 12:27 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-06 3:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I want to user dovecot deliver into a folder that is not at the
root level - how do I do that? How do I specify a folder in a folder?
For *all* messages? Or for certain messages?
Kind of an incomplete
On 2014-01-06 3:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I want to user dovecot deliver into a folder that is not at the
root level - how do I do that? How do I specify a folder in a folder?
For *all* messages? Or for certain messages?
Kind of an incomplete question.
--
Best regards,
Charles
Il 16/10/2012 02:35, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 13.10.2012, at 15.38, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 2012-10-02 21:28 Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 16.07, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
#1 0x7f2fc9fc41b4 in acl_backend_vfile_acllist_try_rebuild (
backend=0x1944240) at acl-backend-vfi
On 13.10.2012, at 15.38, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Il 2012-10-02 21:28 Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
>> On 19.9.2012, at 16.07, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
>>
>>> #1 0x7f2fc9fc41b4 in acl_backend_vfile_acllist_try_rebuild (
>>> backend=0x1944240) at acl-backend-vfile-acllist.c:297
This should fix it:
Il 2012-10-02 22:15 Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 2.10.2012, at 22.28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 19.9.2012, at 16.07, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
#1 0x7f2fc9fc41b4 in acl_backend_vfile_acllist_try_rebuild (
backend=0x1944240) at acl-backend-vfile-acllist.c:297
This backtrace is rather weird.
Il 2012-10-02 21:28 Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 16.07, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
#1 0x7f2fc9fc41b4 in acl_backend_vfile_acllist_try_rebuild (
backend=0x1944240) at acl-backend-vfile-acllist.c:297
This backtrace is rather weird. Could you also do (instead of bt
full):
fr
On 2.10.2012, at 22.28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 19.9.2012, at 16.07, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
>
>> #1 0x7f2fc9fc41b4 in acl_backend_vfile_acllist_try_rebuild (
>> backend=0x1944240) at acl-backend-vfile-acllist.c:297
>
> This backtrace is rather weird. Could you also do (instead of bt full
On 19.9.2012, at 16.07, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> #1 0x7f2fc9fc41b4 in acl_backend_vfile_acllist_try_rebuild (
>backend=0x1944240) at acl-backend-vfile-acllist.c:297
This backtrace is rather weird. Could you also do (instead of bt full):
fr 1
p *ns
p *ns.user
p *auser
It crashes because
Il 24/09/2012 17:40, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 15:07, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 15:03, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 14:48, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when
Il 19/09/2012 15:07, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 15:03, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 14:48, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first
message arrive "dovecot-lda" return a
Il 19/09/2012 19:52, interfaSys sàrl ha scritto:
I see the same crashes on FreeBSD. Turning off ACL makes the crashes
disappear.
I'm getting a different backtrace though and it doesn't seem to be
related to ACL:
Core was generated by `imap-login'.
Thanks for your report.
My backtrace was ge
I see the same crashes on FreeBSD. Turning off ACL makes the crashes
disappear.
I'm getting a different backtrace though and it doesn't seem to be
related to ACL:
Core was generated by `imap-login'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/dovecot/libdo
Il 19/09/2012 15:03, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 14:48, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first
message arrive "dovecot-lda" return a "Segmentation fault", the
message is written to
Il 19/09/2012 14:48, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first message arrive
"dovecot-lda" return a "Segmentation fault", the message is written to the
user's Mailbox but the message remains, als
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first message
> arrive "dovecot-lda" return a "Segmentation fault", the message is written to
> the user's Mailbox but the message remains, also, in the queue of qmail
> (deferral: Segme
On Wed, 18 May 2011 15:14:11 -0300
Gonzalo Rodriguez articulated:
> 2011/5/18 Jerry :
> > On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:47:19 -0300
> > Gonzalo Rodriguez articulated:
> >
> >> I add the line:
> >>
> >> mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
> >
> > Why? You are using virtual delivery. You don't nee
2011/5/18 Jerry :
> On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:47:19 -0300
> Gonzalo Rodriguez articulated:
>
>> I add the line:
>>
>> mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
>
> Why? You are using virtual delivery. You don't need that.
>
in my main.cf have virtual_transport = dovecot
> The following is from my
On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:47:19 -0300
Gonzalo Rodriguez articulated:
> I add the line:
>
> mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
Why? You are using virtual delivery. You don't need that.
The following is from my master.cf file. It works perfectly. This is on
a FreeBSD-8.2 system.
dovecot
I forgot:
$ ls -al
total 136
drwxr-xr-x 6 vmail vmail 4096 May 16 16:48 .
drwxr-xr-x 8 vmail vmail 4096 May 17 15:47 ..
drwx-- 5 vmail vmail 4096 May 18 09:47 Drafts
drwxr-xr-x 5 vmail vmail 4096 May 18 13:10 INBOX
drwx-- 5 vmail vmail 4096 May 17 17:24 Sent
drwx-- 5 vm
sorry first my postconf
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
command_directory = /usr/local/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/local/libexec/postfix
data_directory = /var/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
disable_vrfy_command = yes
mail_owner = _postfix
mailbox_command =
El 18/05/11 08:38, Gonzalo Rodriguez escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem with my dovecot/postfix configuration:
>
> here is my dovecot -n
>
>
> # 1.2.16: /etc/dovecot.conf
> Warning: fd limit 128 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full
> load (more than 768). Either grow the limit or
On Wed, 18 May 2011 10:08:37 -0300
Gonzalo Rodriguez articulated:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem with my dovecot/postfix configuration:
>
> here is my dovecot -n
>
>
> # 1.2.16: /etc/dovecot.conf
> Warning: fd limit 128 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full
> load (more than 768). Eit
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 23:33 +0300, Buzai Andras wrote:
> I have one more question.
> It may sound like a dumb question but I'll ask anyway :).
> Since in Dovecot v2.0, LMTP is running as "root" isn't this a security risk
> of the same level as
> running "deliver" with sudo in Dovecot v1.2?
LMTP r
Hi,
I have one more question.
It may sound like a dumb question but I'll ask anyway :).
Since in Dovecot v2.0, LMTP is running as "root" isn't this a security risk
of the same level as
running "deliver" with sudo in Dovecot v1.2?
Thank you,
Buzai Andras
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Timo S
On 2010-07-12 1:20 PM, Buzai Andras wrote:
> When should I expect the final (production ready) release of Dovecot 2 (an
> approximate time period)?
Sometime between now, and when it is released. ;)
This is free software, and is released when it is ready...
Since it is at rc2, I think you can s
Hi,
Thank you for your answers :).
When should I expect the final (production ready) release of Dovecot 2 (an
approximate time period)?
Thank you,
Buzai Andras
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 00:09 +0300, Buzai Andras wrote:
>
> > dovecot unix
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 00:09 +0300, Buzai Andras wrote:
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=*mysudoeruser* argv=/usr/bin/sudo /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
> -f ${sender} -d ${recipient}
>
> When you say that:
> *
> "Basically the user that calls deliver v
Hi,
My master.cf Postfix file contains the following entry for this:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=*mysudoeruser* argv=/usr/bin/sudo /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
-f ${sender} -d ${recipient}
When you say that:
*
"Basically the user that calls deliver
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 12:30 +0300, Buzai Andras wrote:
> I only call the deliver with sudo from inside Postfix and the sudoer user is
> only allowed to sudo on the deliver binary.
>
> My question is:
> Is this solution secure? Can It be used on a production environment?
> What exactly happens in
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:17, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
>> Where is the "reply to list" button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
>> either. All it has are "reply" and "reply to all". The reply sends to the
>> sender alone if it's a case where there ar
On 21.5.2010, at 16.04, Phil Howard wrote:
> There are a number of posters on the list where the reply goes directly to
> the list alone. I don't know what it is they do with the headers to get it
> to come out that way. Maybe you can ask them what they do, then do that.
http://dovecot.org/cgi-
Charles Marcus put forth on 5/21/2010 10:17 AM:
> On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
>> Where is the "reply to list" button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
>> either. All it has are "reply" and "reply to all". The reply sends to the
>> sender alone if it's a case where there are 2 ad
On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
> Where is the "reply to list" button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
> either. All it has are "reply" and "reply to all". The reply sends to the
> sender alone if it's a case where there are 2 addresses to send to (reply to
> all would send to 2 in
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:45, Noel Butler wrote:
> like you said, you dont really do mail servers
>
> Id LOVE to see you try even 100K users in mail server situation that is
> ever changing, you'd soon open your eyes up.
>
I know it would mean more hits to the DB.
> The reason we moved from
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 08:54 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
>
> I guess you've been bitten by a proper database solution given
> your apprehension for using one.
>
> It's called experience. I could explain many cases where SQL is
> overkill and overhead. But I don't do mail
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:46, Eray Aslan wrote:
> We use Michael Tokarev's tinycdb:
>
> * stable on disk format
> * has atomic updates
> * has a tiny library in case you want to link it statically
> * uses a lot less memory when the process count is large, i.e. scales well
> * rebuilding the dat
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 17:14, Noel Butler wrote:
> I guess you've never used it with tens and tens of thousands of users, let
> alone user numbers well into 6 figures
> and why on gods (or any) earth would I use that load of crap being backed
> up by another form? that clearly makes no sense, w
On 05/18/2010 12:14 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 09:28 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
>> its your network (I hope for your sake).. its up to you how
>> efficient it
>> is.
>>
>> CDB is very fast.
>
> yes it is, if you only have a small number of users.
We use
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 09:28 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 17:48, Noel Butler
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> MySQL makes it such a dream, even with customers adding
> aliases and so
> on, its a simple instruction to mysql via the web portal from
>
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 17:48, Noel Butler wrote:
> CDB, oh dear god, you want to go back in time?
> CDB is no better than any other flatfile based system, it was horrible
> with qmail and it'll be horrible with anything else above a couple
> thousand users, you clearly dont add/del users all the
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 09:05 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 19:25, Noel Butler wrote:
> >
> > %d is derived from the right hand side of a username, dovecot's deliver
> > couldn't care less about verifying the domain, since that is the MTA's
> > job.
> >
>
> No doubt. Howe
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 19:25, Noel Butler wrote:
> > And it did seem to do that already. Mail was sent to dovecot/deliver.
> It
> > included the domain name. But deliver just didn't construct the
> > mail_location correctly due to %d being empty. The resulting path with
> the
> > empty spac
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 16:17 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 14:38, Bradley Giesbrecht <
> bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Virtual docum
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 14:38, Bradley Giesbrecht <
bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert > >wrote:
>>
>> Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
>>>
>>>
>> This seems to be
On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert >wrote:
Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
This seems to be a delivery agent of its own. I don't want Postfix
to do
the delivery. I want Dovecot to do the delivery s
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
>
This seems to be a delivery agent of its own. I don't want Postfix to do
the delivery. I want Dovecot to do the delivery so it can create the
additional cache/index files (whate
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> Post back if you get this fixed.
>
Bsically, what I need to know from THIS list is exactly what conditions the
dovecot/deliver program needs in order to properly fill in the %d variable
for mail_location. Once I know that ... know exactly w
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> I have to admit that I am somewhat confused. You have "postfix" listed
> as user/group in the dovecot.conf file, yet you have "vmail" listed as
> the user in 'master.cf". That doesn't look right.
>
I'm not sure which way things are supposed t
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:16, Jerry wrote:
>
> > Please post the output of "dovecot -n" and "postconf -n". Better,
> > provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at
> > http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger.
> >
>
> I have r
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:16, Jerry wrote:
> Please post the output of "dovecot -n" and "postconf -n". Better,
> provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at
> http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger.
>
I have redacted external IP addresses and domain names.
from dovecot -n:
#
On Mon, 10 May 2010 17:30:48 -0400
Phil Howard articulated:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:11, Romer Ventura
> wrote:
>
> > try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
> > dovecot.conf
> >
>
> What does "change the format of the username" mean?
>
>
>
> > What i did wa
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:23, Romer Ventura wrote:
> man pipe
>
> ${nexthop}
> This macro expands to the next-hop hostname.
>
> This information is modified by the h flag for case
> folding.
>
But what is next hop? I don't have any next hop that I'm awa
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:11, Romer Ventura wrote:
> try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
> dovecot.conf
>
What does "change the format of the username" mean?
> What i did was to set the mail attribute for each user in AD, then perform
> a query for it and have
man pipe
${nexthop}
This macro expands to the next-hop hostname.
This information is modified by the h flag for
case folding.
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry
wrote
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry wrote:
> From my 'master.cf' file:
>
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
> -f ${sender} -d ${us...@${nexthop}
>
> From 'main.cf' file: (snippet)
>
> virtual_gid_m
try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
dovecot.conf
What i did was to set the mail attribute for each user in AD, then
perform a query for it and have dovecot group users by domain, this
way i can have us...@example.net and us...@example.com
Thanks
--
Rome
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:58, Jerry wrote:
>
> See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
>
> Be sure to read the entire page.
>
I have a few times. But now I'm getting a bit of a different perspective on
part of it. The parameters are:
-d : Destination username. If given, the user information
On Mon, 10 May 2010 15:35:15 -0400
Phil Howard articulated:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry
> wrote:
>
> > From my 'master.cf' file:
> >
> > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
> > -f ${se
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry wrote:
> From my 'master.cf' file:
>
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
> -f ${sender} -d ${us...@${nexthop}
>
> From 'main.cf' file: (snippet)
>
> virtual_gid_
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:15, Egbert Jan wrote:
> Could it be that selinux or apparmor are playing games with you???
>
Good idea to check. But I don't have anything in my apparmor setup for
either postfix or dovecot. I don't know about Romer Ventura's config. I do
know the error trying to op
On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:06:27 -0500
Romer Ventura articulated:
> Yes, 1001 are the uid and gid in my system, check your /etc/passwd
> to get the ones for your system.
>
> mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
>
> Thanks
> --
> Romer Ventura
>
> On May 10, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Phil How
> Verzonden: maandag 10 mei 2010 21:08
> Aan: Dovecot Mailing List
> Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] dovecot/deliver ... Can't open
> logfile /var/log/dovecot/error.log: Permission denied
>
>
> I dont know what else.
>
> I tried to chwon postfix:postfix, vmail:vmail, postf
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:07, Romer Ventura wrote:
> I dont know what else.
>
> I tried to chwon postfix:postfix, vmail:vmail, postfix:vmail, vmail:postfix
> and none of them worked. I had to go with chmod 777
>
I believe that is because Postfix is running dovecot/deliver as username
derived fr
I dont know what else.
I tried to chwon postfix:postfix, vmail:vmail, postfix:vmail,
vmail:postfix and none of them worked. I had to go with chmod 777
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
I had to chmod
Yes, 1001 are the uid and gid in my system, check your /etc/passwd
to get the ones for your system.
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:44, Romer Ventura
wrote:
What about you
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:44, Romer Ventura wrote:
> What about your postfix conf..?
> mine is set to:
> virtual_gid_maps = static:1001
> virtual_mailbox_base = /srv/mail/vmail/
> virtual_mailbox_domains = $mydomain
> virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf
> virtual_transport = d
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:42, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
> > I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
>
> That's pretty much *never* a reasonable solution.
>
Absolutely right!
But it's an interim test ... in this case to see what userid the created
file would
What about your postfix conf..?
mine is set to:
virtual_gid_maps = static:1001
virtual_mailbox_base = /srv/mail/vmail/
virtual_mailbox_domains = $mydomain
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:1001
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
Just realized my email was not going to the list.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:20, Romer Ventura wrote:
> I am using static uids:
> mail_uid = vmail
> mail_gid = vmail
> user = vmail
> group = vmail
>
> else it will do what you describe.
>
I have that, too. But it's not running the right userid.
On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
> I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
That's pretty much *never* a reasonable solution.
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
I am using static uids:
mail_uid = vmail
mail_gid = vmail
user = vmail
group = vmail
else it will do what you describe.
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 13:59, Romer Ventura
wrote:
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
I did chmod 777 to see what it would do, and especiall
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I'm getting this ...
May 10 12:45:01 eth0 postfix/local[3416]: A788D685F7: to=<
x...@.net>, relay=local, delay=13, delays=13/0/0/0.03,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temp
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:14 -0700, Alex wrote:
> auth default:
> mechanisms: plain digest-md5 cram-md5
> passdb:
> driver: sql
> args: /etc/mail/dovecot-sql.conf
> userdb:
> driver: prefetch
> userdb:
> driver: static
> args: uid=51 gid=51
You are using MySQL, so
Hello Noel,
dovecot -n shows this:
# 1.2.11: /etc/mail/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32.8-cluster x86_64 openSUSE 11.2 (x86_64)
base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/
log_path: /var/log/dovecot.err
info_log_path: /var/log/dovecot.info
protocols: imaps pop3s
listen: 333.33.33.33
ssl_listen: 333.33.33.33
ssl_c
bugger sent that direct, please send that output to the list :)
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:04 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Please show the output of dovecot -n
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 15:23 -0700, Alex wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the hint.
> >
> > I enabled 'socket listen' it in dov
Thanks for the hint.
I enabled 'socket listen' it in dovecot.conf as you pointed it out.
Now dovecot.err log has these error messages:
May 04 14:57:19 deliver(us...@some_domain.com): Error: User
us...@some_domain.com is missing UID (set mail_uid)
May 04 14:57:19 deliver(us...@some_domain.com): E
Il 04/05/2010 23:14, Alex ha scritto:
Hello folks,
I was trying to set up Dovecot deliver LDA instead of Postfix default
virtual LDA
May 04 10:43:10 deliver(some_addr...@some_domain.com): Error: userdb
lookup: connect(/var/run/dovecot//auth-master) failed: No such file or
directory
Hello,
Does procmail still log the same thing about "error writing to.."? Maybe
a slightly different script:
#!/bin/sh
file=/tmp/deliver.`date +%s`.$$
cd /tmp
cat > $file
ulimit -c unlimited
/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver $* < $file
code=$?
rm $file
if [ $code != 0 ]; then
echo 'deliver failed'
Hi Timo, deliver works with the script and ive got some fails while
using it, but the script dose not wrote anything.
Any further ideas?
Steve
On 29.12.2009 22:19, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 14:34 +0100, Steve Wagner wrote:
The only error message i have, come from procmail.lo
Sorry for the late answer, i was quiet busy the time.
I now execute the script. I report back when the error occures next time.
Steve
Am 29.12.2009 22:19, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 14:34 +0100, Steve Wagner wrote:
>> The only error message i have, come from procmail.log:
>>
On 1.1.2010, at 2.24, Michael wrote:
> How can I get deliver LDA and IMAP to use separate user DB SQL queries?
Currently you can't really. But there's %s variable that expands to either imap
or lda. You could do some kind of conditional checking with it. For example:
select imap-stuff, .. where
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 14:34 +0100, Steve Wagner wrote:
> The only error message i have, come from procmail.log:
>
> 24918-Folder: /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver
>3720
> 24919-procmail: Error while writing to
> "/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
> 24920:From keineantwortadre..
Am 28.12.2009 um 11:55 schrieb Steve Wagner:
> if header :contains "Organization" "web.de" { discard; stop; }
>
> This often works, but sometimes it fails. Procmail reports then that
> deliver reported an error (but not which) and delivers them to my inbox.
> There are also no message in dovecots
Am 28.12.2009 um 21:51 schrieb Steve Wagner:
> Sorry it took some time to get in to this failing situation.
>
> Procmail log-->
>
> procmail: [29952] Mon Dec 28 21:36:33 2009
> procmail: Match on "< 256000"
> procmail: Locking "spamassassin.lock"
> procmail: Executing "/usr/bin/spamc,-U,/var/ru
Am 28.12.2009 um 15:09 schrieb Steve Wagner:
> [snip]
>
> :0 w
> | /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver
Looks uncritical to me. Although there is no default rule at the end of
.procmailrc, Dovecot deliver and Sieve should reroute everything not
catched by a rule to INBOX.
Did Procmails "VERBOS
My procmailrc looks like this. I have a lot of my old mail filerings
ruls commented out and this is the rest which is active:
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc -U /var/run/spamd.sock
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
:0w
* ^X-Spam-Status: YES
|~/.deliver-to-maildir seen .Junk/
:0
* ^
Am 28.12.2009 um 14:34 schrieb Steve Wagner:
> Ok ive tested it. The sieve script works as expected.
>
> The only error message i have, come from procmail.log:
>
> 24918-Folder: /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver
> 3720
> 24919-procmail: Error while writing to
> "/opt/dovecot/libexec/
Ok ive tested it. The sieve script works as expected.
The only error message i have, come from procmail.log:
24918-Folder: /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver
3720
24919-procmail: Error while writing to
"/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
24920:From keineantwortadre...@web.de Tue
Am 28.12.2009 um 13:02 schrieb Steve Wagner:
> Hi Tobi, yes but it is correct. It should only discard messages that
> have this header. The sieve filter is larger, this are only the parts
> witch use discard.
>
> Steve
>
> Am 28.12.2009 12:25, schrieb Tobias Lang:
>> Am 28.12.2009 um 11:55 schr
Hi Tobi, yes but it is correct. It should only discard messages that
have this header. The sieve filter is larger, this are only the parts
witch use discard.
Steve
Am 28.12.2009 12:25, schrieb Tobias Lang:
> Am 28.12.2009 um 11:55 schrieb Steve Wagner:
>
>> if header :contains "Organization" "we
Am 28.12.2009 um 11:55 schrieb Steve Wagner:
> if header :contains "Organization" "web.de" { discard; stop; }
>
> This often works, but sometimes it fails. Procmail reports then that
> deliver reported an error (but not which) and delivers them to my inbox.
> There are also no message in dovecots
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 10:03 +0530, Aravind Divakaran wrote:
> Strace with ENOSPC
>
> 09:57:39.782569 write(10, "T5vfloaIeSOsJdT6IXB146wSWLNKqK\n4v"..., 28672)
> = -1 ENOSPC (No space left on device)
..
> 09:57:40.708162
> unlink("/home/vmail/example.com/user1/tmp/1261456056.M913860P17478.node01")
> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:08 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> > Dec 14 12:46:04 server01 postfix/pipe[1870]: 57489E913:
>> > to=, orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
>> > delay=1703, delays=1369/328/0/5.9, dsn=5.7.0, status=bounced
>> (permission
>> > denied. Command output: Not enough disk space )
>>
>> Can y
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:08 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Dec 14 12:46:04 server01 postfix/pipe[1870]: 57489E913:
> > to=, orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
> > delay=1703, delays=1369/328/0/5.9, dsn=5.7.0, status=bounced (permission
> > denied. Command output: Not enough disk space )
>
> Can you get a s
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:08 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Dec 14 12:46:04 server01 postfix/pipe[1870]: 57489E913:
> > to=, orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
> > delay=1703, delays=1369/328/0/5.9, dsn=5.7.0, status=bounced (permission
> > denied. Command output: Not enough disk space )
Also what did deliv
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
