On 5.12.2011, at 1.17, Amaury Le Pivain wrote:
> I have an old physical freebsd 6.2 server running Dovecot 1.0.7. I wanted to
> virtualised it.
>
> So, I did a dd from the physical server and then I restored it on then now
> Virtual Machine.
>
> I booted the server, all services are running ju
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 08:17 +0200, wolfgang.frie...@desy.de wrote:
> tonight dovecot 1.2beta4 crashed for the first time with an assertion
> failed. See attached log file. Around that time nobody was logged in into
> dovecot and there were no other mail deliveries going on.
..
> istream-tee.c: li
On 4/10/2009, wolfgang.frie...@desy.de (wolfgang.frie...@desy.de) wrote:
> There is unfortunately no core dump file. I have attached the dovecot -n
> output as well.
Posting these in-line is preferred...
Did you try upgrading to 1.2rc2 yet? Thats kind of the first thing you
should try if you ar
ttp://www.nodens.biz/
Nodens Solutions Pte Ltd
"where there is freedom in your choice"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timo
Sirainen
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 5:07 PM
To: Horn Wijaya
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovec
ehalf Of Horn
> Wijaya
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:38 PM
> To: 'Raymond Lillard'
> Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Crash
>
> Hi Ray,
>
> I have a feeling that it's something else too after googling found out that
> fsta
e Ltd
"where there is freedom in your choice"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horn
Wijaya
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:38 PM
To: 'Raymond Lillard'
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Crash
Hi Ray,
I
e Ltd
"where there is freedom in your choice"
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Lillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:32 PM
To: Horn Wijaya
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Crash
Horn,
Are you running on NFS?
What OS?
These
Horn,
Are you running on NFS?
What OS?
These are file system errors. I'm at home and don't
have access to proper documentation, but 75 might be
an error from a remote RPC system.
Me thinks you've got other problems than Dovecot.
Ray
Horn Wijaya wrote:
> Ouch...
> 1.1.1 didn't solve it.
>
Solutions Pte Ltd
"where there is freedom in your choice"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horn
Wijaya
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:01 PM
To: 'Patrick Nagel'; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Crash
6 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Crash
On Monday 14 July 2008, Horn Wijaya wrote:
> Jul 13 08:19:15 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
> type
> Jul 13 08:19:18 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
> type
> Jul 13 08:19:20
Ouch...
1.1.1 didn't solve it.
Jul 14 10:54:22 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
type
Jul 14 10:54:27 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
type
Jul 14 10:54:31 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
type
Jul 14 10:54:37 hera dovecot:
On Monday 14 July 2008, Horn Wijaya wrote:
> Jul 13 08:19:15 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
> type
> Jul 13 08:19:18 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
> type
> Jul 13 08:19:20 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
> type
> Jul 1
>> Btw, why is the whole Dovecot system shutting down due to a bug in the
>> 'imap' subprocess? It's rather annoying for the rest of the users...
>
> It shouldnt' be.
>
>> May 20 15:16:32 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.info] IMAP(inand):
>> Server shutting down
>
> Do you mean you didn't c
On May 21, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Peter Eriksson wrote:
mail_process_size setting limits this to 256 MB by default. You could
increase it or drop it completely. It's there mainly to catch memory
leaks and such because users rarely reach this limit.
Question: Should Dovecot handle this better someho
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On May 20, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Peter Eriksson wrote:
>
>> It's always the same user causing these "Out of memory" errors
>> (unlikely since this machine has 8GB of RAM and XXGB of swap
>> and typically has plenty of memory free. His maildir directory is
>> 1.4GB in size.
>>
On May 20, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Peter Eriksson wrote:
It's always the same user causing these "Out of memory" errors
(unlikely since this machine has 8GB of RAM and XXGB of swap
and typically has plenty of memory free. His maildir directory is
1.4GB in size.
Hmm... He seems to have a *huge* T
Noticed some more stuff this time:
May 20 19:37:38 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(joher):
block_alloc(): Out of memory
May 20 19:37:38 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 961074 mail.error] child 10772
(imap) returned error 83 (Out of memory)
May 20 19:40:47 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833
No core dump for now.
Core dump backtrace got now:
(dbx) where
[1] __lwp_kill(0x0, 0x6, 0x100082ee8, 0x19d4e0, 0x0, 0x0), at
0x7e9ceab8
[2] raise(0x6, 0x0, 0x, 0x7eae6000, 0x0, 0x0),
at 0x7e96b434
[3] abort(0x1, 0x1b8, 0x100082ee8, 0x19d4e0, 0x0
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:29 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote:
>
>> May 14 11:46:51 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(joher):
>> file maildir-uidlist.c: line 143: assertion failed: (UIDLIS
>> T_IS_LOCKED(uidlist))
>
> If this still hapens with 1.0.13, it would hel
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:29 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote:
> May 14 11:46:51 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(joher):
> file maildir-uidlist.c: line 143: assertion failed: (UIDLIS
> T_IS_LOCKED(uidlist))
If this still hapens with 1.0.13, it would help to get a gdb backtrace.
http://d
On 5/14/2008, Peter Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I hope the performance is better since 1.0's performance (on our system)
> is really bad (so bad that some of my users have been complaining since
> it feels more sluggish than the older UW-Imap-based system (which
> granted had it mail spoo
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/14/2008, Peter Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> Also, output of dovecot -n, and more platform details (ie, are you using
>>> NFS?) will make it easier for someone (else) to help...
>
>> NFS: Yes.
>
> Ok, then dovecot -n output may be necessary... there are so
On 5/14/2008, Peter Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Also, output of dovecot -n, and more platform details (ie, are you using
>> NFS?) will make it easier for someone (else) to help...
> NFS: Yes.
Ok, then dovecot -n output may be necessary... there are some issues
with NFS on the 1.0.x ver
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/14/2008, Peter Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Any good ideas on how to pin-point the problem?
>
> If memory serves, some of these were fixed in recent versions... upgrade
> to 1.0.13 (or maybe even 1.1rc5) and see if that fixes it...
Hmm..? I thought I had i
On 5/14/2008, Peter Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Any good ideas on how to pin-point the problem?
If memory serves, some of these were fixed in recent versions... upgrade
to 1.0.13 (or maybe even 1.1rc5) and see if that fixes it...
Also, output of dovecot -n, and more platform details (ie
25 matches
Mail list logo
