On 08/20/2011 05:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 14:38:25 -0700, Steve Fatula wrote:
I see lots of these messages in the log file for one machine and
account. Near as I can tell, the client still works (it's mine), but,
the messages concern me.
Is there some known issue with A
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 14:38:25 -0700, Steve Fatula wrote:
> I see lots of these messages in the log file for one machine and
> account. Near as I can tell, the client still works (it's mine), but,
> the messages concern me.
>
> Is there some known issue with Apple mail, or, if not, how to capture
ahh just found this in my spam folder.. maybe it has good judgement
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 21:22 -0500, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting Noel Butler :
>
> >> No... Really, I've got lots of machines on older distros (3+ years)
> >> that are just plain stable and just plain work.
> >>
> >
> >
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:24:27PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I guess I should mention that I don't really mind people asking
> questions when they're using an old version, but if it's a bug
> report there's a good chance the answer is then "upgrade".
Indeed, thanks for the patience and sorry f
On 9/22/2009, Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de) wrote:
> If I'm using Dovecot 1.0.X to serve a handful of users with Maildirs,
> I don't care a bit even for 90% of performance back or forth. I do
> care about maintenance.
>
> If it works well in practice and is not known to be insecure, wh
Charles Marcus schrieb:
> On 9/21/2009 11:33 AM, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
>>> Of course, eventually I'm sure dovecot will hit a wall where performance
>>> improvements will be negligible, but for now, the difference between the
>>> 1.0.x version and 1.2.x is so great that anyone who refuses to upg
On 9/21/2009 11:33 AM, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
>> Of course, eventually I'm sure dovecot will hit a wall where performance
>> improvements will be negligible, but for now, the difference between the
>> 1.0.x version and 1.2.x is so great that anyone who refuses to upgrade
>> is simply missing out
Quoting Charles Marcus :
That said, the biggest reason I see for upgrading often, especially for
things like dovecot, is to take advantage of the performance
improvements and new capabilities/options.
I've not seen to many lately, but maybe that is due to differences in
say mbox versus maildir
On 9/21/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> I guess I should mention that I don't really mind people asking
> questions when they're using an old version, but if it's a bug report
> there's a good chance the answer is then "upgrade".
Yours is one of the most helpful and patient attitudes I'
I guess I should mention that I don't really mind people asking
questions when they're using an old version, but if it's a bug report
there's a good chance the answer is then "upgrade".
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:03:48PM +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> The problem however is many people very dangerously and wrongly consider
> that their beloved favourite distro package, is in fact the current
> stable and the only one that exists. I'm horrified by the number of
> people responsible fo
I was never meant to start a flame, so forgive me if I didn't observe
the list guidelines.
The issue is solved now, it was a simple firewall (anti-malware setting)
issue…
This runs against distro vs distro arguments, version vs version, etc.
Before writing to this list I already Googled, con
Quoting Noel Butler :
No... Really, I've got lots of machines on older distros (3+ years)
that are just plain stable and just plain work.
until they are owned.
Not a one has been owned yet. And why would they be since there
are regular security updates, and of course out-of-band security
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 13:46 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > BTW its not natural, it might be to the newbies and SOHO's, but most
> > people who know what they doing use source packages, because they can
> > compile them to their own liking.
>
> Sounds like a case for Gentoo Linux, FreeBSD/NetB
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 16:26 -0500, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
>
> No... Really, I've got lots of machines on older distros (3+ years)
> that are just plain stable and just plain work.
>
until they are owned.
> > cant recall if it was 8.04 or 8.10,
>
> Well, that's helpful... Since the cu
Am 18.09.2009, 22:32 Uhr, schrieb Noel Butler :
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:56 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
No\"{e}l, I don't think such findings belong here.
Ubuntu 8.04 is a long-term support release (desktop three years, server
five
years), and it's natural that users will use that.
Am 18.09.2009, 16:57 Uhr, schrieb Charles Marcus
:
On 9/18/2009, Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de) wrote:
Ubuntu 8.04 is a long-term support release (desktop three years, server
five
years), and it's natural that users will use that.
It is also natural that critical servers should
Quoting Noel Butler :
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:11 -0500, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
> I have never understood anyone who would use a distro for critical
> applications that forces them to use 3+ year old software.
Because it is stable and just plain works, of course.
Oh what rubbish
No..
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:11 -0500, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
> > I have never understood anyone who would use a distro for critical
> > applications that forces them to use 3+ year old software.
>
> Because it is stable and just plain works, of course.
Oh what rubbish, ubuntu released a brand
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:56 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> No\"{e}l, I don't think such findings belong here.
>
> Ubuntu 8.04 is a long-term support release (desktop three years, server five
> years), and it's natural that users will use that.
>
Really? I had not realised ubuntu wrote Dov
On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Gabriele wrote:
No problems with messages under 4MB size (there are huge messages,
up to 25MB), but as soon as I try to move messages from 4MB and up,
the connection hangs, nothing happens, the application becomes
barely responsive, I have quit and re-open it t
Quoting Charles Marcus :
On 9/18/2009, Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de) wrote:
Ubuntu 8.04 is a long-term support release (desktop three years, server five
years), and it's natural that users will use that.
Yes.
It is also natural that critical servers should always be running the
l
On 9/18/2009, Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de) wrote:
> Ubuntu 8.04 is a long-term support release (desktop three years, server five
> years), and it's natural that users will use that.
It is also natural that critical servers should always be running the
latest stable release of critical
Noel Butler schrieb:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 06:12 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> On 9/18/2009, Gabriele (listarolo_dove...@musimac.it) wrote:
>>> dovecot 1.0.10
>> This is really old... it is very likely that upgrading dovecot to a more
>> current build - either 1.1.19, or better, 1.2.5 - will
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 06:12 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 9/18/2009, Gabriele (listarolo_dove...@musimac.it) wrote:
> > dovecot 1.0.10
>
> This is really old... it is very likely that upgrading dovecot to a more
> current build - either 1.1.19, or better, 1.2.5 - will solve your
> problem, bu
On 9/18/2009, Gabriele (listarolo_dove...@musimac.it) wrote:
> dovecot 1.0.10
This is really old... it is very likely that upgrading dovecot to a more
current build - either 1.1.19, or better, 1.2.5 - will solve your
problem, but would be recommended anyway...
--
Best regards,
Charles
26 matches
Mail list logo
