Jules M wrote:
Am 09.01.2009 um 17:03 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Jules M wrote:
Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using
such horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable",
I've set up a
Am 09.01.2009 um 17:03 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Jules M wrote:
Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for
using such horribly out of date versions just because they run
"stable", I've set up a page with .de
Jules M wrote:
Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using
such horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable",
I've set up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use
under le
Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using
such horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable",
I've set up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use
under lenny.
http://
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
http://www.rollernet.us/opensource/
Sorry I'm retarded;
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
If you really mean 'lenny'
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
If you really mean 'lenny'
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
> horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
> up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
>
If you really mean 'lenny', this won't help much.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:05:59PM +0200, Moritz Mertinkat may have written:
> Hi there,
>
> i'm looking for Debian sarge dovecot packages (yes, still running sarge).
> Anyone here that has a backported package?
I will likely be building one soon. It will be in the same location as I
put in the
Hi,
> I'd love some up-to-date packages for Dovecot on Etch. I need to get
> some practice in on my personal server before I migrate work... from
> 0.99.14 (Still going strong, Timo :)
You can get my 1.0.1 packages from
http://www.mertinkat.net/dovecot/
Built for Debian etch/i386.
Hope everythi
Moritz Mertinkat wrote:
Hi there,
anyone interested in Debian Dovecot 1.0.1 packages?
I have created a package for etch/stable...
Could do that for sarge/oldstable as well.
Greets,
Maurice.
I'd love some up-to-date packages for Dovecot on Etch. I need to get some
practice in on my personal
Bernd Kuhls wrote:
Brian T Glenn wrote:
They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a
little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from
backports.org and is built for sarge.
deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main
I would like to have the sam
Brian T Glenn wrote:
They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a
little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from
backports.org and is built for sarge.
deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main
Hi,
I would like to have the same for Etch.
Co
13 matches
Mail list logo
