Monday, August 29, 2011, 4:32:55 AM, Joseph wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> Actually, this gives me pause that maybe I should not enirely remove
>>> the dotlocking method
>>>
>>>
>>> http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/alpine-info/2008-July/000996.html
>>>
>>>
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Actually, this gives me pause that maybe I should not enirely remove
the dotlocking method
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/alpine-info/2008-July/000996.html
Any comments on the (sole) use of POSIX fcntl() type locking?
As long as
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 18:30 -0700, Joseph Tam wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Joseph Tam wrote:
>
> > Thanks to all who've made suggestions. It seems removing dotlocks as
> > a locking method is the way to go.
>
> Actually, this gives me pause that maybe I should not enirely remove
> the dotlockin
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Joseph Tam wrote:
Thanks to all who've made suggestions. It seems removing dotlocks as
a locking method is the way to go.
Actually, this gives me pause that maybe I should not enirely remove
the dotlocking method
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/alpine
Thanks to all who've made suggestions. It seems removing dotlocks as
a locking method is the way to go. There is another dotlock locking
variant mentioned in 10-mail.conf that seems to address this situation
for those that can't get away from dotlocks:
# dotlock_try: Same as dotlock,
On 08/25/2011 07:38 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 25.8.2011, at 5.12, David Warden wrote:
>
>> In your mail_location you can specify a different control and index
>> directory as a place where the user has no quotas. I'm not quite sure which
>> it is (control or index) that says where the dotloc
On 25.8.2011, at 5.12, David Warden wrote:
> In your mail_location you can specify a different control and index directory
> as a place where the user has no quotas. I'm not quite sure which it is
> (control or index) that says where the dotlock file goes but it should be one
> of them.
Nope,
On Aug 24, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Joseph Tam wrote:
>
> A mail user reported that he filled up his INBOX (despite reminders he
> was approaching his filesystem quota), and furthermore, he could not
> fix the situation because he couldn't expunge message he marked for
> deletion.
>
> The dovecot logs
Don't use dotlock files.
Method that generally works nice also is to start rejecting email for
the user when they are at 99% capacity, so you leave just alittle room
for that kind of thing left.
Quoting Joseph Tam :
A mail user reported that he filled up his INBOX (despite reminders he
w
