On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 01:16 +0100, Eugene wrote:
> > Thanks, I've added the Makefile patch, but the other one I'm not too
> > sure about, it seems it would print things twice if the loop actually
> > looped, so I left it for now. Also, your code can access
> > buf[sizeof(buf)] which would be a buf
Hi Johannes,
From: "Johannes Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do you plan to implement 'out of band' dspam calling?
> BTW maybe there is no need for a separate 'queue' folder especially as
> we
> only need a message signature. I think it can be stored in some buffer
> array
> so as the dspam cal
Hi Eugene,
> > And it prints the full command line to the syslog, I assume? Thanks for
> > testing!
>
> It solves the problem here as well =)
> Thanks for the update.
Yeah, I thought so, somehow I just didn't have the idea to look at
debugv() when you mentioned the problem.
> Do you plan to imp
Hi Johannes,
From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I just committed a fix to debugv(), can you try that? If you downloaded
> the tarball, get this one:
> http://git.sipsolutions.net/?p=dovecot-antispam.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz
>
> If you can confirm that works I'll make a new release.
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:51 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
> Yes, it's great!
> Nov 5 10:50:13 venus imap: antispam: /usr/local/bin/dspam
> --source=error --class=innocent --signature=4911bedc107624643064458
> --user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just wanted to make sure, thanks! I've pushed out a tag, tarb
I just committed a fix to debugv(), can you try that? If you downloaded
the tarball, get this one:
http://git.sipsolutions.net/?p=dovecot-antispam.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz
If you can confirm that works I'll make a new release.
johannes
The fixed version works perfectly, thank you very much!
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:25 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
> >
> hmm. I wonder if there's a bug in debugv(), can you comment that call
> out in dspam-exec.c?
>
> johannes
> >>> Aha, that's getting closer ... I still got t
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:25 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
hmm. I wonder if there's a bug in debugv(), can you comment that call
out in dspam-exec.c?
johannes
Aha, that's getting closer ... I still got the 'Failed to call dspam'
message, but dspam now seems to be called:
Nov 5 10:11:05 venus
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:25 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
> >> hmm. I wonder if there's a bug in debugv(), can you comment that call
> >> out in dspam-exec.c?
> >>
> >> johannes
> >
> > Aha, that's getting closer ... I still got the 'Failed to call dspam'
> > message, but dspam now seems to be cal
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:03 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
Hi folks -
I am configuring a new system and the antispam plugin is the last
piece I need, everything else is working. Thanks to Johannes for this
plugin, it's exactly what I want and an elegant solution for filter
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:03 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> I am configuring a new system and the antispam plugin is the last piece
> I need, everything else is working. Thanks to Johannes for this plugin,
> it's exactly what I want and an elegant solution for filter training.
> Bu
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:03 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
Hi folks -
I am configuring a new system and the antispam plugin is the last piece
I need, everything else is working. Thanks to Johannes for this plugin,
it's exactly what I want and an elegant solution for filter
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:03 -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> I am configuring a new system and the antispam plugin is the last piece
> I need, everything else is working. Thanks to Johannes for this plugin,
> it's exactly what I want and an elegant solution for filter training.
> Bu
13 matches
Mail list logo
