Hi!
I'm pretty unsure this is only a TB3 problem. Saw the same result with
TB 2.0, but I'm unsure if this was after changing something on the
server. After 2 days of mailproblems we downgraded back to Dovecot 1.1
yesterday and no one reported this bug since this downgrade.
Greetings,
Thorste
Am 21.01.2010 18:14, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 21.1.2010, at 19.13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 21.1.2010, at 19.10, David Halik wrote:
>>
>>> This seems to have started since TB 3.0 came out. Especially, with the new
>>> indexing feature they added. I'm not seeing it with Pine or SQMail
>>>
On 01/21/2010 12:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.1.2010, at 19.13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.1.2010, at 19.10, David Halik wrote:
This seems to have started since TB 3.0 came out. Especially, with the new
indexing feature they added. I'm not seeing it with Pine or SQMail acces
On 21.1.2010, at 19.13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.1.2010, at 19.10, David Halik wrote:
>
>> This seems to have started since TB 3.0 came out. Especially, with the new
>> indexing feature they added. I'm not seeing it with Pine or SQMail accessing
>> the same servers. The problem is all my us
On 21.1.2010, at 19.10, David Halik wrote:
> This seems to have started since TB 3.0 came out. Especially, with the new
> indexing feature they added. I'm not seeing it with Pine or SQMail accessing
> the same servers. The problem is all my users are convinced it's my mail
> servers. ;) However
On 01/21/2010 12:00 PM, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
Hello, same problem here. I use Thunderbird 3.0.1. The strange thing
is that with the same version of TB on my PC at home I don't have this
issue. The same TB on my work PC has this issue and only on one
account (that has Dovecot as imap
On 21/01/2010 17:53, David Halik wrote:
Good news and bad news.
The good news is that I've been core dump free for about 24 hours. The
duplicate message issue is still there, so if you wanted that fix then
I guess the patch is not complete yet, otherwise it looks good.
The bad news is that
Good news and bad news.
The good news is that I've been core dump free for about 24 hours. The
duplicate message issue is still there, so if you wanted that fix then I
guess the patch is not complete yet, otherwise it looks good.
The bad news is that I'm now convinced that another problem I'
* Timo Sirainen :
> > This should fix it (and hopefully doesn't expose another bug):
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/a1177c6cf8c7
>
> I think that fixes all of the "duplicate entry in uidlist" errors that have
> been reported recently. So please test soon and report how it goes over a
On 20.1.2010, at 20.24, David Halik wrote:
> Jan 20 13:13:59 gehenna13.rutgers.edu dovecot: IMAP(user):
> /rci/nqu/rci/u2/user/dovecot/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at
> line 3:
> 1259771459.M806388P24066V04240001I002E8FC6_0.gehenna7.rutgers.edu,S=3927:2,S
> (uid 8420 -> 9532)
.
On 01/20/2010 04:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 20.1.2010, at 11.45, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 12.1.2010, at 16.47, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So there's something weird going on why it's in the filename hash
table, but not in the array. I'll try to figure it out later..
This should fix it (and hop
On 20.1.2010, at 11.45, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 12.1.2010, at 16.47, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> So there's something weird going on why it's in the filename hash table, but
>> not in the array. I'll try to figure it out later..
>
> This should fix it (and hopefully doesn't expose another bug):
On 12.1.2010, at 16.47, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> So there's something weird going on why it's in the filename hash table, but
> not in the array. I'll try to figure it out later..
This should fix it (and hopefully doesn't expose another bug):
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/a1177c6cf8c7
We're seeing this same coredump on a few dozen customers as well. Also
Netapp/NFS.
cor
Hi David,
On 1/14/10 3:13 PM, "David Halik" wrote:
>
> FYI, we backed out of the "noac" change today. When our 20K accounts
> started coming to work the NetApp NFS server was pushing 70% CPU usage
> and 25K NFS Ops/s, which resulted in all kinds of other havoc as normal
> services started becomi
FYI, we backed out of the "noac" change today. When our 20K accounts
started coming to work the NetApp NFS server was pushing 70% CPU usage
and 25K NFS Ops/s, which resulted in all kinds of other havoc as normal
services started becoming slow. This server usally runs around 25% and
5K, so suc
Same here. I laughed because our help desk started sending us the exact
same complaints and then today I got a little bit of a red nose when a
director's mail "disappeared" in a meeting. ;) Whoops.
It looks like users who end up with the off by 1 uid list rebuild and
crash experience and emp
Timo,
> -Original Message-
> From: Timo Sirainen
>
> 1721 is not in the recs[] list, since it's sorted and the first one is
1962.
>
> So there's something weird going on why it's in the filename hash
table, but
> not in the array. I'll try to figure it out later..
I hope your move is go
On 8.1.2010, at 10.34, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> p *rec
>
> (gdb) p *rec
> $2 = {uid = 1721, flags = 8,
> filename = 0x9c4e2b0
> "1247223070.M198961P26186.postamt.charite.de,S=4080,W=4182:2,Sa", extensions
> = 0x0}
rec->uid is 1721.
> (gdb) p *recs[0]
> $4 = {uid = 1962, flags = 8,
> fil
Does that output help?
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * David Halik :
> >
> > Ralf, you're seeing the same panic I've been going back and forth
> > with Timo on for the last two weeks. Do you think you could run a
> > couple of quick gdb commands? Timo asked me for these last week, but
> > I thought it m
* David Halik :
>
> Ralf, you're seeing the same panic I've been going back and forth
> with Timo on for the last two weeks. Do you think you could run a
> couple of quick gdb commands? Timo asked me for these last week, but
> I thought it might be useful if they came from you as well for
> compar
Ralf, you're seeing the same panic I've been going back and forth with
Timo on for the last two weeks. Do you think you could run a couple of
quick gdb commands? Timo asked me for these last week, but I thought it
might be useful if they came from you as well for comparison. It also
looks lik
Hi Ralf, Timo commited a patch for this last week, give it a try. So far
it has stopped these crashes for me.
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/56dd8c276ed6
On 12/30/2009 4:54 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt:
I got about 20 (!) of these today
Log:
Dec 30 10:48
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> I got about 20 (!) of these today
Log:
Dec 30 10:48:26 postamt dovecot: IMAP(cto-4c): Panic: file cmd-list.c:
line 242 (ns_get_listed_prefix): assertion failed: (match == IMAP_MATCH_YES)
Dec 30 10:48:26 postamt dovecot: IMAP(ct): Raw backtrace: imap
[0x80f15d1] -> imap
24 matches
Mail list logo
