On 9/24/2008 1:03 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Ed W escreveu:
>> Actually I agree with the OP. Thunderbird "works" with attachments, but
>> it's handling seems very creaky... (I'm a big fan of TB by the way!)
>>
>> Stuff which annoys me is that it seems to download the attachment every
>> tim
On Sep 24, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Thomas Gropp wrote:
"dovecot: Fatal: IMAP(): io_loop_handle_add: epoll_ctl(1,
1): File exists" (which file??)
epoll_ctl(2):
EEXIST op was EPOLL_CTL_ADD, and the supplied file
descriptor fd is
already in epfd.
I don't really know why
Ed W escreveu:
> Actually I agree with the OP. Thunderbird "works" with attachments, but
> it's handling seems very creaky... (I'm a big fan of TB by the way!)
>
> Stuff which annoys me is that it seems to download the attachment every
> time it's needed and in particular it seems to download it i
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 9/24/2008, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> I'd suggest trying first with another client to see if it's not an
>> issue with Thunderbird, which in my opinion is not very good at handling
>> attachments in imap.
>>
>
> Been working fine for us
On 9/24/2008, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'd suggest trying first with another client to see if it's not an
> issue with Thunderbird, which in my opinion is not very good at handling
> attachments in imap.
Been working fine for us on 60+ computers for years, with only one i
From: Thomas Gropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am testing Dovecot 1.1.3 at the moment to see if I can migrate from
> UW-Imap(mbox) to Dovecot(maildir). Because I dont' want to influence the
> production server I installed Dovecot on an ununsed computer with some
> dummy-testusers using ssl and maild
