Re: New Configuration

2021-05-29 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-05-29 21:31, Eric Shields | Mass Transit Honchkrow wrote: Hi, I'm setting up an email server behind a NAT, and I have the necessary DNS records, iptables/ufw rules, and ACLs in place. However, I cannot sign in with my chosen username, which does exist on the same computer I'm hosting th

New Configuration

2021-05-29 Thread Eric Shields | Mass Transit Honchkrow
Hi, I'm setting up an email server behind a NAT, and I have the necessary DNS records, iptables/ufw rules, and ACLs in place. However, I cannot sign in with my chosen username, which does exist on the same computer I'm hosting the server on. I am using PAM, not a database, to hold credential infor

Re: [Dovecot] Trying to Hide Namespace - new configuration options?

2008-08-13 Thread Daniel Watts
Charles Marcus wrote: On 8/13/2008, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: If i set the prefix to blank I only see my Inbox and Deleted folders. Interestingly it shows 'Deleted' not 'Trash'. I guess Thunderbird renames 'Trash'. Maybe this is a TBird issue rather than dovecot? The Trash is a '

Re: [Dovecot] Trying to Hide Namespace - new configuration options?

2008-08-13 Thread Charles Marcus
On 8/13/2008, Daniel Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: If i set the prefix to blank I only see my Inbox and Deleted folders. Interestingly it shows 'Deleted' not 'Trash'. I guess Thunderbird renames 'Trash'. Maybe this is a TBird issue rather than dovecot? The Trash is a 'special folder' to mos

[Dovecot] Trying to Hide Namespace - new configuration options?

2008-08-13 Thread Daniel Watts
Using 1.1.2 We have: # default namespace namespace private { separator = / prefix = inbox = yes #location = maildir:/home/virtual/%h #Maildir } # for backwards compatibility: namespace private { separator = / prefix = mail/