It seems its troll time again on this list, ohh maybe its Harry in
disguise... So I will play along, for today anyway :)
On 19/03/2016 18:11, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:37:04 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
On 14/03/2016 18:49, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
>>
>> and
On 19/03/2016 08:11, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Obviously you must work for people that have not the slightest idea about
using hardware ...
So you have UPSes, power supplies and motherboards that never fail. Good
luck to you, you are running on it.
For everyone else reading this, do no
On 14/03/2016 18:49, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
and you've never seen these cause problems with FS? then you must be
a
newbie, in over 25 years I've seen it happen several times - yes even
after an apparent controlled shutdown.
Maybe you're doing something wrong then. because in my la
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:37:04 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
> On 14/03/2016 18:49, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> and you've never seen these cause problems with FS? then you must be
> >> a
> >> newbie, in over 25 years I've seen it happen several times - yes even
> >> after an appare
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:59:28 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
> On 14/03/2016 09:59, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000
> > Noel Butler wrote:
> >
> >> On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
> >> > James wrote:
>
On 14/03/2016 09:59, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
> James wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>>
>> > zfs set sync=disa
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
> On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
> > James wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >>
> >> > zfs set sync=disabled ?
> >>
> >> Only if you are happy
On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
James wrote:
On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> zfs set sync=disabled ?
Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
I don't know the actual setup, but if you have no UPC you
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 11:47:23 +0100
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
> James wrote:
>
> > On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >
> > > zfs set sync=disabled ?
> >
> > Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
>
> I don't know th
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
James wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> > zfs set sync=disabled ?
>
> Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
I don't know the actual setup, but if you have no UPC you shouldn't host email
services anyway.
--
Re
On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> zfs set sync=disabled ?
Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
On 11/03/2016 14:58, Juan Bernhard wrote:
Someone has experiences with ZFS and NFS(v3) in high load environments?
Thanks
Be careful to no do any synchronous writes under ZFS.
By default all NFS writes are synchronous but I assume dovcot sync
writes all data anyway so in this case the NFS s
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:58:00 -0300
Juan Bernhard wrote:
>
> El 11/03/2016 a las 11:22 a.m., Alessio Cecchi escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm evaluating to switch from NetApp to a ZFS appliance (like Qsan). Our
> > setup is Dovecot, Maildir for email storage and NFS to share mailboxes
> > (more than
El 11/03/2016 a las 12:04 p.m., Charles Marcus escribió:
On 3/11/2016 9:58 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
Be careful to no do any synchronous writes under ZFS. Every sync write
can take up to 3 seconds of latency (under freebsd, I didnt test ZFS in
linux). Im using it in a 3k user environment and wo
On 3/11/2016 9:58 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
> Be careful to no do any synchronous writes under ZFS. Every sync write
> can take up to 3 seconds of latency (under freebsd, I didnt test ZFS in
> linux). Im using it in a 3k user environment and works great with a 4TB
> raid 10, and dovecot cache fi
El 11/03/2016 a las 11:22 a.m., Alessio Cecchi escribió:
Hi,
I'm evaluating to switch from NetApp to a ZFS appliance (like Qsan). Our
setup is Dovecot, Maildir for email storage and NFS to share mailboxes
(more than 30k users) across POP/IMAP and MX servers.
NetApp NFS works fine also under hi
Hi,
I'm evaluating to switch from NetApp to a ZFS appliance (like Qsan). Our
setup is Dovecot, Maildir for email storage and NFS to share mailboxes
(more than 30k users) across POP/IMAP and MX servers.
NetApp NFS works fine also under high load but have some limitation for
inode numbers per
17 matches
Mail list logo
