On 2019-02-03 21:12, Philon wrote:
On 03 Feb 2019, at 22:07, MRob wrote:
Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from
reading about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and
that it would conserve disc space.
But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double t
>
> On 03 Feb 2019, at 22:07, MRob wrote:
>
> Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading about
> it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it would conserve
> disc space.
>
> But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported
Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading
about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it
would conserve disc space.
But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported.
I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one accou