Luckily ocsp stapling is an SSL extension and clients not supporting it won't
be asking for it either.
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Alkuperäinen viesti Lähettäjä: Andrew McGlashan
Päivämäärä: 6.3.2016 10.36
(GMT+02:00) Saaja: dovecot@dovecot.org Aihe: Re: Implementation o
On 3/03/2016 11:58 PM, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi wrote:
> We will take this feature under consideration and see if it can be implemented
> in future release. Thank you for your suggestion!
As much as I hate Outlook (Look Out!), there are loads of people using
really old versions; 2003 is no longer sup
On 03-03-16 14:23, Gedalya wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 08:17 AM, dove...@flut.demon.nl wrote:
>> On 03-03-16 14:09, Gedalya wrote:
>>> On 03/03/2016 07:30 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
BTW, I can imagine that Thunderbird can already do that, as it shares much
of the Firefox code base.
>>> Thunderb
On 03/03/2016 08:17 AM, dove...@flut.demon.nl wrote:
> On 03-03-16 14:09, Gedalya wrote:
>> On 03/03/2016 07:30 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>> BTW, I can imagine that Thunderbird can already do that, as it shares much
>>> of the Firefox code base.
>> Thunderbird definitely does validate certificates
On 03-03-16 14:09, Gedalya wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 07:30 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> BTW, I can imagine that Thunderbird can already do that, as it shares much
>> of the Firefox code base.
> Thunderbird definitely does validate certificates via OCSP, enabled by
> default and I've run into that the
On 03/03/2016 07:30 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> BTW, I can imagine that Thunderbird can already do that, as it shares much of
> the Firefox code base.
Thunderbird definitely does validate certificates via OCSP, enabled by default
and I've run into that the hard way a couple of times wrt StartSSL h
On 03-03-16 13:58, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi wrote:
>> On March 3, 2016 at 2:15 PM dove...@flut.demon.nl wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03-03-16 13:04, A. Schulze wrote:
>>> dovecot:
>>>
So I would like to know if Dovecot is planning to feature OCSP stapling.
That way I know for sure my "must staple" cert
> On March 3, 2016 at 2:15 PM dove...@flut.demon.nl wrote:
>
>
> On 03-03-16 13:04, A. Schulze wrote:
> >
> > dovecot:
> >
> >> So I would like to know if Dovecot is planning to feature OCSP stapling.
> >> That way I know for sure my "must staple" certificates can be used by
> >> Dovecot. And in
On 03-03-16 13:04, A. Schulze wrote:
>
> dovecot:
>
>> So I would like to know if Dovecot is planning to feature OCSP stapling.
>> That way I know for sure my "must staple" certificates can be used by
>> Dovecot. And in my opinion, every TLS offering daemon should be up to
>> par to the capabilitie
Op 3-3-2016 om 13:04 schreef A. Schulze:
dovecot:
So I would like to know if Dovecot is planning to feature OCSP stapling.
That way I know for sure my "must staple" certificates can be used by
Dovecot. And in my opinion, every TLS offering daemon should be up to
par to the capabilities of TL
Op 3-3-2016 om 13:04 schreef A. Schulze:
dovecot:
So I would like to know if Dovecot is planning to feature OCSP stapling.
That way I know for sure my "must staple" certificates can be used by
Dovecot. And in my opinion, every TLS offering daemon should be up to
par to the capabilities of TL
dovecot:
So I would like to know if Dovecot is planning to feature OCSP stapling.
That way I know for sure my "must staple" certificates can be used by
Dovecot. And in my opinion, every TLS offering daemon should be up to
par to the capabilities of TLS.. Not lag behind :)
What's your opinion o
Hi all,
About a year ago, Torsten already asked for OCSP stapling
(http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-April/100632.html).
Unfortunately, there was no answer to his question.
Now RFC 7633 ("TLS Feature Extension",
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7633, a.k.a. "Must Staple") has landed,
revoc
13 matches
Mail list logo
