Re: Dovecot infrastructure

2017-08-08 Thread Simone Marx :: Edinet Srl
Hi Sounds a bit less good. If you only have one server now, then partitioning out by function will probably be *much* easier. Everything except dovecot is very easy to spread out across servers, so to take the easy route I would probably keep dovecot where it is, and spread out the other functio

Re: Dovecot infrastructure

2017-08-07 Thread Lorens Kockum
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Simone Marx :: Edinet Srl wrote: > Hi, > I would need some suggestion for a dovecot based mail infrastructure. > Actually, only one server (with dovecot sendmail amavis spamassassin clamav > etc etc) is no longer enouth, so I thought I would put on a more c

Re: Dovecot infrastructure

2017-08-07 Thread Sami Ketola
> On 7 Aug 2017, at 10.14, Simone Marx :: Edinet Srl wrote: > > Hi, > I would need some suggestion for a dovecot based mail infrastructure. > Actually, only one server (with dovecot sendmail amavis spamassassin clamav > etc etc) is no longer enouth, so I thought I would put on a more complex >

Dovecot infrastructure

2017-08-07 Thread Simone Marx :: Edinet Srl
Hi, I would need some suggestion for a dovecot based mail infrastructure. Actually, only one server (with dovecot sendmail amavis spamassassin clamav etc etc) is no longer enouth, so I thought I would put on a more complex infrastructure on different servers. But I do not know a few things. I