Re: Different behavior of ACLs in MUA and doveadm

2015-09-08 Thread Thomas Leuxner
* Timo Sirainen 2015.09.08 14:28: > > Both debug levels raised, it doesn't log about the problem when using > > doveadm. I guess the patch is not enough: > > With doveadm you need to give -D parameter for it to log debug output. Comparing this to the previous imap log it does seem to ignore th

Re: Different behavior of ACLs in MUA and doveadm

2015-09-08 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 09/08/2015 02:26 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > * Timo Sirainen 2015.09.08 12:20: > >> How does the PublicMailboxAdmins group get set? Looks to me like the problem >> is that it's not getting set to doveadm. Here's an easy way to check if >> that's the problem or something else: >> http://hg

Re: Different behavior of ACLs in MUA and doveadm

2015-09-08 Thread Thomas Leuxner
* Timo Sirainen 2015.09.08 12:20: > How does the PublicMailboxAdmins group get set? Looks to me like the problem > is that it's not getting set to doveadm. Here's an easy way to check if > that's the problem or something else: > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/500e8dd7a389 > > If that d

Re: Different behavior of ACLs in MUA and doveadm

2015-09-08 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 31 Dec 2014, at 23:10, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > > I have noticed a difference in the behavior of ACLs. When used in a MUA the > following global ACL works fine and has the desired effect - new mailboxes > can be created by a user being part of the 'PublicMailboxAdmins' group: How does the P

Re: Different behavior of ACLs in MUA and doveadm

2015-09-08 Thread Thomas Leuxner
* Thomas Leuxner 2014.12.31 22:10: namespace { list = yes location = mdbox:/var/vmail/public:INDEXPVT=~/mdbox/public prefix = Public/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = public } $ cat /var/vmail/conf.d/leuxner.net/global-acl INBOX owner lrwstiekxap Public/* group=PublicMailboxAd

Different behavior of ACLs in MUA and doveadm

2014-12-31 Thread Thomas Leuxner
I have noticed a difference in the behavior of ACLs. When used in a MUA the following global ACL works fine and has the desired effect - new mailboxes can be created by a user being part of the 'PublicMailboxAdmins' group: [ global-acl: ] INBOX owner lrwstiekxap Public/* group=PublicMailboxAdmi