Il 2020-05-11 18:51 Aki Tuomi ha scritto:
Except now you lost the cache. Which is not really necessary. Why not
use 'doveadm expunge -u victim mailbox box uid number' instead? The
uid number is same as the number in file name.
Sure - I used it and worked like a charm!
I was just curious to und
> On 11/05/2020 19:48 Gionatan Danti wrote:
>
>
> Il 2020-05-11 17:41 Aki Tuomi ha scritto:
> > The index will be rebuilt once you try to access the mail.
>
> Hi Aki, I probably misunderstood yor previous reply. So, the index will
> be fixed when either:
> - running doveadm force-sync
> - a
Il 2020-05-11 17:41 Aki Tuomi ha scritto:
The index will be rebuilt once you try to access the mail.
Hi Aki, I probably misunderstood yor previous reply. So, the index will
be fixed when either:
- running doveadm force-sync
- accessing the mailbox (ie: via IMAP).
This means that removing an
> On 11/05/2020 17:37 Gionatan Danti wrote:
>
>
> Il 2020-05-11 15:54 Aki Tuomi ha scritto:
> > If you manually change the mailbox contents like that, you need to run
> > doveadm force-resync to fix the situation.
> >
> > Aki
>
> Ok, so it means that dovecot will *not* automatically fix the
Il 2020-05-11 15:54 Aki Tuomi ha scritto:
If you manually change the mailbox contents like that, you need to run
doveadm force-resync to fix the situation.
Aki
Ok, so it means that dovecot will *not* automatically fix the index file
and I need to reconstruct the index file, right?
Just for
> On 11/05/2020 16:45 Gionatan Danti wrote:
>
>
> Dear list,
> I recently had to delete some messages from an sdbox mailbox, for which
> I used the canonical "doveadm expunge" command without issues.
>
> However I got curious and, on a test mailbox, I deleted an unimportant
> message direc
Dear list,
I recently had to delete some messages from an sdbox mailbox, for which
I used the canonical "doveadm expunge" command without issues.
However I got curious and, on a test mailbox, I deleted an unimportant
message directly from the filesystem (rm u.650). After removing the
file, th
