On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 05:20:31PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PrebuiltBinaries#Automatically_Built_Packages
>
> ...
> deb http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ testing-auto/dovecot-2.2 main
Thanks a lot.
I installed dovecot version 2:2.2.17~rc1-1~auto+5 using that line.
Am 07.05.2015 um 01:45 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:02:12AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/94bd895721d8
>
> Unfortunately, I applied single changeset 94bd895721d8 over Debian
> version 2.2.16-1 to create an updated Debian
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:02:12AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/94bd895721d8
Unfortunately, I applied single changeset 94bd895721d8 over Debian
version 2.2.16-1 to create an updated Debian package and I can still
reproduce the problem when usin
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/94bd895721d8
For reference, this is the "dovecot -n" output matching the previous
debug output:
# 2.2.16: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian stretch/sid
mail_debug = yes
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
mail_plugins = mail_log notify
namespace inbox {
inbox = ye
Debug output:
May 6 11:23:42 qemu-sid dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.16 starting up for imap
(core dumps disabled)
May 6 11:24:06 qemu-sid dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.122.8, lip=192.168.122.8, mpid=441, secured,
session=
May 6 11:24:06 qemu-sid dovecot: imap(b
On 05/06/2015 09:57 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 05:26 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure:
>>
>> telnet localhost 143
>>
>> and then type this:
>>
>> A0001 CAPABILITY
>> A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser"
>> A0003 SELECT "inbox-b"
>> A0
On 05/05/2015 05:26 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure:
>
> telnet localhost 143
>
> and then type this:
>
> A0001 CAPABILITY
> A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser"
> A0003 SELECT "inbox-b"
> A0004 EXPUNGE
> A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE
> A0006 FET
Am 05.05.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 05.05.2015 um 19:22 schrieb Santiago Vila:
>> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 05:15:16PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> is this related to mbox only ?
>>
>> I don't know. The bug happens as I explained, and current documentation
>> says mbox is st
Am 05.05.2015 um 19:22 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 05:15:16PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> is this related to mbox only ?
>
> I don't know. The bug happens as I explained, and current documentation
> says mbox is still supported (I really hope documentation is correct he
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 05:15:16PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> is this related to mbox only ?
I don't know. The bug happens as I explained, and current documentation
says mbox is still supported (I really hope documentation is correct here).
> i have no mbox install online to test
A local
Am 05.05.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure:
>
> telnet localhost 143
>
> and then type this:
>
> A0001 CAPABILITY
> A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser"
> A0003 SELECT "inbox-b"
> A0004 EXPUNGE
> A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE
> A0006 FE
I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure:
telnet localhost 143
and then type this:
A0001 CAPABILITY
A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser"
A0003 SELECT "inbox-b"
A0004 EXPUNGE
A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE
A0006 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER
A0007 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT]
A0008 STORE 1 +FLAGS
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:43:23PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> > BTW: Does getmail have an option doing the same as fetchmail --folder
> > option at all?
>
> http://pyropus.ca/software/getmail/configuration.html#retriever-parameters
>
> All IMAP retriever types also take the following opti
Am 04.05.2015 um 22:13 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Boh fetchmail did you verified with getmail ?
>
> No, I didn't. The client should be irrelevant. Nobody should be able
> to corrupt a remote mailbox only by issuing imap comma
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Boh fetchmail did you verified with getmail ?
No, I didn't. The client should be irrelevant. Nobody should be able
to corrupt a remote mailbox only by issuing imap commands.
BTW: Does getmail have an option doing the same a
Am 04.05.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> Greetings.
>
> Thanks to Jelmer Vernooij, who has just uploaded version 2.2.16 for
> Debian unstable, I can confirm that this bug may still be reproduced
> in version 2.2.16, so it has *not* been fixed yet.
>
> Several months ago I was told "I can't
Greetings.
Thanks to Jelmer Vernooij, who has just uploaded version 2.2.16 for
Debian unstable, I can confirm that this bug may still be reproduced
in version 2.2.16, so it has *not* been fixed yet.
Several months ago I was told "I can't reproduce it in dovecot hg", or
something like that. Well,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 10:55:13AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2015, at 16:23, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > I wrote about this three weeks ago but got no answer. I'm going to
> > officially "forward" the Debian bug this time, with all the details.
> >
> > The test case is just 840 byte
Am 20.02.2015 um 15:03 schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2/19/2015 4:34 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
In such case we would love to know what is the commit that fixed this,
so that we can apply it to the 2.2.13 version in Debian. We have
frozen the distribution as we are about to release jessie as Debian
On 2/19/2015 4:34 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> In such case we would love to know what is the commit that fixed this,
> so that we can apply it to the 2.2.13 version in Debian. We have
> frozen the distribution as we are about to release jessie as Debian 8,
> so no new upstream releases are allowed
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2015, at 16:23, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > I wrote about this three weeks ago but got no answer. I'm going to
> > officially "forward" the Debian bug this time, with all the details.
> >
> > The test case is just 840 bytes long. Please give
On 14 Feb 2015, at 16:23, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I wrote about this three weeks ago but got no answer. I'm going to
> officially "forward" the Debian bug this time, with all the details.
>
> The test case is just 840 bytes long. Please give it a try.
..
> Package: dovecot-imapd
> Version: 1:2.2.
Hello.
I wrote about this three weeks ago but got no answer. I'm going to
officially "forward" the Debian bug this time, with all the details.
The test case is just 840 bytes long. Please give it a try.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Santiago Vila
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Date:
24 matches
Mail list logo
