}
}
service lmtp {
inet_listener lmtp {
address = 127.0.0.1 ::1
port = 24
}
}
ssl_cert =
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: John Fawcett via dovecot
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Juli 2024 12:34
An:dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: IMAPSie
On 03/07/2024 20:53, postfix_dovecot--- via dovecot wrote:
Hi John,
again you're hitting the point!
I put a "report-spam.sieve fired!" and "report-ham.sieve fired!" debug message in the
scripts and monitored with "journalctl -u dovecot -f | grep fired".
The APPEND event (move to junk) trigge
---Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: John Fawcett via dovecot
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Juli 2024 16:21
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: IMAPSieve plugin will not run rspamd script
(Resending because of size limit exceeded on previous post)
Hi Jens
that looks much better, tho
(Resending because of size limit exceeded on previous post)
Hi Jens
that looks much better, though not yet completely solved. What you're
now getting is both rules firing when you move a message to Junk,
whereas you only want the first one firing. I guess you will have no
rules firing when yo
vice auth {
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
mode = 0666
}
}
service lmtp {
inet_listener lmtp {
address = 127.0.0.1 ::1
port = 24
}
}
ssl_cert =
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Juli 2024 12:34
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: IMAPSieve plugin
Hi Jens
just one update and some more insight looking at the code
Your causes should be COPY APPEND (whether applying proposed solution
(1) or (2). I updated inline below for solution (2).
Logic for that: I was testing from Thunderbird which is generating a
MOVE event. In the imapsieve plugi
Hi Jens
that log looks to me like it is for moving a message from Inbox to Junk
rather than Junk to Inbox.
The issue I see is that how you defined the rules does not match your
namespace naming scheme. Event being received is the following. In that
event you can see the name of the mailbox i
Hi John!
You are of course absolutely right - wild experimentation is rarely a good
approach. But you are surely familiar with the situation when you have done
everything logical and then, in your desperation, you start to change things
that you would not otherwise change ;)
I've actually gott