restart dovecot and re-login the Imap client. All IMAP folders are
> rebuilt but the same folders like before are still missing.
ITERINDEX lists the IMAP folders using the directories that exist in INDEX
path. If you delete the index directories, it shouldn't be showing you any IMAP
esystem, I see the subfolder like other
folder with identical owner an permissions.
But when I do doveadm mailbox list -u [user] the IMAP folder is not
displayed.
So I have deleted all files in /opt/dovecot/[hash]/[user] because I
use INDEX=/opt/dovecot/%2.256Nu/%u:ITERINDEX
The restart dove
nd re-login the Imap client. All IMAP folders are
rebuilt but the same folders like before are still missing.
Any ideas please?
thanks, Frank
doveconf -n
# 2.3.21.1 (d492236fa0): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.21.1 (49005e73)
# OS: Linux 5.15.149-1-pve x86_64 AlmaLinux re
[user] the IMAP folder is not
> > displayed.
> >
> > So I have deleted all files in /opt/dovecot/[hash]/[user] because I
> > use INDEX=/opt/dovecot/%2.256Nu/%u:ITERINDEX
> > The restart dovecot and re-login the Imap client. All IMAP folders are
> > rebuilt but the
eadm mailbox list -u [user] the IMAP folder is not
displayed.
So I have deleted all files in /opt/dovecot/[hash]/[user] because I
use INDEX=/opt/dovecot/%2.256Nu/%u:ITERINDEX
The restart dovecot and re-login the Imap client. All IMAP folders are
rebuilt but the same folders like before are still
t -u [user] the IMAP folder is not
displayed.
So I have deleted all files in /opt/dovecot/[hash]/[user] because I use
INDEX=/opt/dovecot/%2.256Nu/%u:ITERINDEX
The restart dovecot and re-login the Imap client. All IMAP folders are
rebuilt but the same folders like before are still missing.
Any id
On 10 May 2021, at 19:31, Matt Grant wrote:
> We are using Outlook 2013, 2016 and 2019,
You definitely should not be using Outlook 2013. It has serious issues, and
does not support modern TLS v1.2/1.3
I am unsure if Outlook 2016 does, but I know 2013 does not. Also, mainstream
support for Outl
Hi!
Is it well known that Outlook cannot process RFC 2086 or RFC 4134 ACLs?
We are using Outlook 2013, 2016 and 2019, and with 2013 can
definitely create shared folders with content that are not saved to the
server, even though Outlook 'pretends' quite erroneously that they are -
black hole for
Op 28-12-20 om 12:56 schreef Aki Tuomi:
in your mail location, where you have specified `mbox:~/...`
We do not recommend using mbox mail format for read-write, as the
support for that is limited.
Noted, that did the trick, thanks.
/Elise
On 28/12/2020 13.10, Elise wrote:
> Op 27-12-20 om 16:16 schreef Aki Tuomi:
>
>> The .imap directories contain indexes for dovecot. If you want to put
>> them elsewhere, try adding :INDEX=/somewhere/else/%u to your mail
>> location.
>
> Thanks for this. Where should I put this line or is that par
> On 27/12/2020 17:10 Elise wrote:
>
>
> My user account is located at /usr/home/elise and has a subfolder ./mail
> In that folder I have some subfolders/subdirectories. What happens now is
> that dovecot creates all kind of .imap folders in these subfolders.
> They
My user account is located at /usr/home/elise and has a subfolder ./mail
In that folder I have some subfolders/subdirectories. What happens now
is that dovecot creates all kind of .imap folders in these subfolders.
They are all exact mirrors of the base folder(s) the .imap is part of.
Can you
Hi Gert,
Well thanks to your advice and knowing that there is no specific config to
be done for Outlook, I checked the config in Dovecot more carefully. It
turns out I was using %u in the mail location instead of %n, which is what
is properly needed in my particular overall setup with Postfix and
Hello Gert,
Thanks for this, but I mentioned all works fine in Thunderbird. It's
Office 365 Outlook where the messages do not show. And I tried the same
technique that you show, the equivalent in Outlook, and still no
messages appear.
Andrew
On 8/8/19 9:34 pm, Gert van Dijk via dovecot wro
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:58 PM Andrew Bernard via dovecot
wrote:
>
> I'm new to Dovecot. Using Dovecot IMAP with Postfix, everything works
> fine using Thunderbird. But with the same setup, no messages show in
> IMAP folders for user accounts created in Outlook, accessing e
I'm new to Dovecot. Using Dovecot IMAP with Postfix, everything works
fine using Thunderbird. But with the same setup, no messages show in
IMAP folders for user accounts created in Outlook, accessing exactly the
same server as the accounts in Thunderbird.
Dovecot version 2.3.7.1.
Is
> On 2 Oct 2018, at 15.28, Jerry wrote:
>>
>
> Nobody is going to stop using Outlook because some *.nix user has gotten his
> shorts up in a knot. Now, I did ask this question on a MS Outlook Tech Forum.
> One of the first responses I got was to ask exactly what Dovecot's response
> was to the
On 2018-10-02 16:02, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> No, that's not how the listescape plugin works. You can't change the
> filesystem separator with or without listescape plugin. It's always "." with
> Maildir++.
This exactly my point. This fact is nowhere stated in the documentation.
I'm actually not
On 2 Oct 2018, at 22.52, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
>
> On 2018-10-01 04:07, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Listescape maybe?
>
> It should be mentioned somehow that one can't just change the hierarchy
> separator on the fly (without manual changes to the fs).
>
On 2018-10-01 04:07, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Listescape maybe?
It should be mentioned somehow that one can't just change the hierarchy
separator on the fly (without manual changes to the fs).
If you used . as the separator, it would look this in the filesystem:
>On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 09:59, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>>
>>> As I have no control over their minds, hands, and client software, I wish
>>> I could enforce the policy from the server, returning an error message to
>>> the client.
>>>
>>> On its turn, this requires the client to listen to such serv
I think we need a public compliance test, similar to html and ssl, then people
would start questioning the quality of their own client, and migrate to better
ones. When Micro$oft will eventually feel the pinch, then they will start
fixing their $hit. People have the power! (I like that song.)
O
As I have no control over their minds, hands, and client software, I wish I
could enforce the policy from the server, returning an
error message to the client.
On its turn, this requires the client to listen to such server messages,
operated by a smarter user.
the problem with pseudomail p
this seems to form properly.
thank you very much
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28 Sep 2018, at 16.44, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
user attempts to create folders with / dovecot naturally cannot create it
so it returns error but outlook of course
"create" it and keep dat
The question is - can dovecot be configured so it will automatically
replace slash in name with something else?
And how would this help? Outlook would still go ahead and create the folder
with / in it, and dovecot would create a folder with, say - in it and now you'd
have two folders.
Aki
I tell users to limit the folder characters to /0-9a-zA-Z_/, because anything
else may upset a mail client or server.
As I have no control over their minds, hands, and client software, I wish I
could enforce the policy from the server, returning an error message to the
client.
On its turn, thi
On 28 Sep 2018, at 16.44, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> user attempts to create folders with / dovecot naturally cannot create it so
> it returns error but outlook of course "create" it and keep data in local
> store only. data is lost when you remove local store .pst file.
>
> The question is -
Sorry Aki, you are right.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 09:59, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> On 29 September 2018 at 10:05 Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> A similar problem occurs with "."
>>
>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 15:44, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>
>> > user atte
> On 29 September 2018 at 10:05 Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> A similar problem occurs with "."
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 15:44, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> > user attempts to create folders with /
> > dovecot naturally cannot create it so it return
+1
A similar problem occurs with "."
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 15:44, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> user attempts to create folders with /
> dovecot naturally cannot create it so it returns error but outlook of
> course "create" it and keep data in local store only. data i
user attempts to create folders with /
dovecot naturally cannot create it so it returns error but outlook of
course "create" it and keep data in local store only. data is lost when
you remove local store .pst file.
The question is - can dovecot be configured so it will automatically
replace s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Stanislaw Findeisen wrote:
I have just setup IMAP with Maildir, but unfortunately some clients
create their own folders instead of using those specified in
15-mailboxes.conf . What could be the reason?
Because the clients do s
Dear All
I have just setup IMAP with Maildir, but unfortunately some clients
create their own folders instead of using those specified in
15-mailboxes.conf . What could be the reason?
Here's what it looks like:
> B list "" *
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Sent) "." "Sent Messages"
> * LIST (\HasNoChi
Excellent, that works for me. Actually, I add one more setting to be on the
safe side regarding IMAP capitalisation rules (or non-rules).
namespace/inbox/mailbox=bla namespace/inbox/mailbox/bla/name=Bla
namespace/inbox/mailbox/bla/autoexpunge=6h
Thanks a lot.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Tim
On 17 Jan 2017, at 13.36, Thorsten Hater wrote:
>
> So, returning from the LDAP userdb does not change situation.
> As I said, I would to set folder names dynamicaly, without setting
> up a mailbox in advance.
> Here the problem is discussed
>
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-August/09
So, returning from the LDAP userdb does not change situation.
As I said, I would to set folder names dynamicaly, without setting
up a mailbox in advance.
Here the problem is discussed
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-August/092023.html
but no solution is found apart from defining the name
* Thorsten Hater 2017.01.17 12:04:
> userdb {
>driver = static
>args = namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
> }
I'm almost sure that 'driver = static' contradicts the concept of userdb
overrides:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/ExtraFields
If you can't go with 'passwd-fil
I know, but it is not present in the string returned by the userdb,
which is set up for testing
userdb {
driver = static
args = namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
}
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> * Thorsten Hater 2017.01.17 10:57:
>
> > Unfortunately,
* Thorsten Hater 2017.01.17 10:57:
> Unfortunately, this yields the same problem
>
> Debug: Unknown userdb
> setting: plugin/userdb_namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
> > userdb_namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
'plugin' is not part of the userdb override. It is literally as a
Unfortunately, this yields the same problem
Debug: Unknown userdb
setting: plugin/userdb_namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
Thorsten
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> * Thorsten Hater 2017.01.17 09:40:
>
> > namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
> >
> > fr
* Thorsten Hater 2017.01.17 09:40:
> namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
>
> from a userdb, which results in
>
> Debug: Unknown userdb setting:
> plugin/namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
userdb_namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Descripti
Dear all,
is there a way to allow users to set up something like autoexpunge
on an individual IMAP folder basis?
The idea I implemented does not seem to work, namely returning
namespace/inbox/mailbox/Bla/autoexpunge=6h
from a userdb, which results in
Debug: Unknown userdb setting:
plugin/names
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 05:16:07 -0400, Jerry stated:
>On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:36:35 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov stated:
>
>>On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:57:45 +0300 (EEST)
>>Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>> > Alternatively you can use `dsync` to perform backup with a native
>>> > Dovecot tool. It's able
> On October 22, 2016 at 12:16 PM Jerry wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:36:35 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov stated:
>
> >On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:57:45 +0300 (EEST)
> >Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >> > Alternatively you can use `dsync` to perform backup with a native
> >> > Dovecot tool.
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:36:35 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov stated:
>On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:57:45 +0300 (EEST)
>Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>[...]
>> > Alternatively you can use `dsync` to perform backup with a native
>> > Dovecot tool. It's able to sync mailboxes of any Dovecot user --
>> > including synch
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:57:45 +0300 (EEST)
Aki Tuomi wrote:
[...]
> > Alternatively you can use `dsync` to perform backup with a native
> > Dovecot tool. It's able to sync mailboxes of any Dovecot user --
> > including synchronizing a mailbox to an empty (yet) spool.
> > You'll need to do a bit o
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:38:31 +0300 (EEST)
Aki Tuomi wrote:
[...]
> > > > Alternatively you can use `dsync` to perform backup with a
> > > > native Dovecot tool. It's able to sync mailboxes of any
> > > > Dovecot user -- including synchronizing a mailbox to an empty
> > > > (yet) spool. You'll ne
> On October 20, 2016 at 5:11 PM Konstantin Khomoutov
> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:57:45 +0300 (EEST)
> Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > Alternatively you can use `dsync` to perform backup with a native
> > > Dovecot tool. It's able to sync mailboxes of any Dovecot user --
> > > in
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:57:45 +0300 (EEST)
Aki Tuomi wrote:
[...]
> > Alternatively you can use `dsync` to perform backup with a native
> > Dovecot tool. It's able to sync mailboxes of any Dovecot user --
> > including synchronizing a mailbox to an empty (yet) spool.
> > You'll need to do a bit o
es all
> > mail in IMAP format. I want to back up the mail folders, install a new
> > HD, install the latest FreeBSD OS and then reinstall my programs.
> > Reinstalling Dovecot is simple, but how do I reinstall the IMAP
> > folders? Can Dovecot backup the folders onto a CD
t FreeBSD OS and then reinstall my programs.
> Reinstalling Dovecot is simple, but how do I reinstall the IMAP
> folders? Can Dovecot backup the folders onto a CD and then import them
> when I reinstall it? My mail is kept under “/var/mail/vmail”. Should I
> just back up that entire dire
simple, but how do I reinstall the IMAP
folders? Can Dovecot backup the folders onto a CD and then import them
when I reinstall it? My mail is kept under “/var/mail/vmail”. Should I
just back up that entire directory structure and then restore it later?
Thanks!
--
Jerry
Anyone? No suggestions whatsoever?
Nick
On 16/9/2015 2:52 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
We have one user who is complaining that he has lost mails from 3 imap
folders, administered through squirrelmail.
The folders suddenly appeared unregistered, and once manually
registered they were
Hello,
We have one user who is complaining that he has lost mails from 3 imap
folders, administered through squirrelmail.
The folders suddenly appeared unregistered, and once manually registered
they were empty.
Has anyone observed something like this?
We are running two servers (as VMs
Hi Steve,
for some reason I didn't get you message though the mailing list (my ml
settings?), but only directly. For the sake of completeness I'm replying
here - I hope that's OK.
Shared mailboxes are really easy to implement. Just enable the namespace
(type = shared) in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ma
Hi Daniel,
Hmm - I'm happy to use different 'user names' to log into Dovecot... as
long as each of these logins can still subscribe to the same universe of
folders I have available at present. I can envision using steve_mobile
and steve_desktop as logins, as long as these still provide access
Hi Steve,
I don't think the IMAP protocol has the concept of a "user agent". So
there is no way for an IMAP server to distinguish between client programs.
You could use POP and poll different mailboxes - but your clients
probably don't support that. So you'll have to use different users.
But tha
Hi Steve,
I don't know if dovecot can use different 'subscriptions' but you can create
different accounts and then link (ln -s) the relevant folders in each
respective maildir.
Cheers,
B
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 01:40:57PM +0100, Steve wrote:
> I have a working Dovecot IMAP server (v. 2.2.9) wh
I have a working Dovecot IMAP server (v. 2.2.9) where I have a single
user but a lot of folders (over 800 in total, hierarchically arranged,
about 50 of which are in active use.)
I have multiple clients (including k9Mail on Android and Thunderbird on
Linux and Windows). These clients all prese
Hi,
On 05/29/2015 06:17 AM, Alex JOST wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 03:38 schrieb Alex Regan:
Hi,
I have dovecot-2.2.15 on fedora21 with Thunderbird and having some
difficulty creating subfolders and deleting folders.
Creating subfolders results in a folder at the root with a caret instead
of a sla
Am 26.05.2015 um 03:38 schrieb Alex Regan:
Hi,
I have dovecot-2.2.15 on fedora21 with Thunderbird and having some
difficulty creating subfolders and deleting folders.
Creating subfolders results in a folder at the root with a caret instead
of a slash called folder^subfolder with an entry in .su
Hi,
I have dovecot-2.2.15 on fedora21 with Thunderbird and having some
difficulty creating subfolders and deleting folders.
Creating subfolders results in a folder at the root with a caret instead
of a slash called folder^subfolder with an entry in .subscriptions with
that name, instead of a
We have just migrated from cyrus-imap to dovecot 2.2.9 on Ubuntu. By
default, all our user's manually created folders appear at the same
folder level as INBOX (i.e., they are next to INBOX, and not inside
INBOX in a typical tree view of the folders).
But on Dovecot, users are able to create new fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quoting Greg Sullivan :
I was gobsmacked when I discovered that duplicates could easily occur!
"move" is not atomic in a filesystem either. Under circumstances it has to
be implemented by "cp && rm". Unless you protect the move's source by
lock
Quoting Greg Sullivan :
I was gobsmacked when I discovered that duplicates could easily occur!
Quote from the IMAP wikipedia page:
Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) is a protocol for e-mail retrieval
and storage developed by Mark Crispin in 1986 at Stanford University as an
alternative to
On 05/08/2014 17:29, Greg Sullivan wrote:
That's promising that it should be doable. (yes, all I want is for the move
to only occur once - duplicate messages is not a "move" at all) I'll
forward your suggestions to the Thunderbird & Postbox teams.
In the meantime I'll continue to evaluate helpd
Am 06.08.2014 um 12:15 schrieb Greg Sullivan:
> Jochen,
> I don't have any in-depth knowledge of the IMAP protocol. I'm just saying
> that given that IMAP is designed for concurrent access from multiple
> clients, I would have expected it to behave much better when more than one
> person attempts
Jochen,
I don't have any in-depth knowledge of the IMAP protocol. I'm just saying
that given that IMAP is designed for concurrent access from multiple
clients, I would have expected it to behave much better when more than one
person attempts to move a message, that's all. I was gobsmacked when I
di
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Greg Sullivan wrote:
> I must say I am extremely disappointed that intra-account moves are not
> atomic. As far as I can tell, IMAP was designed to allow shared access, so
> in my opinion this operation should be atomic. Heaven FORBID that I should
> ask for entire conversa
That's promising that it should be doable. (yes, all I want is for the move
to only occur once - duplicate messages is not a "move" at all) I'll
forward your suggestions to the Thunderbird & Postbox teams.
In the meantime I'll continue to evaluate helpdesk systems and
"collaborative inbox" produc
Note that MOVE isn't atomic even between moving within one user's folders. The
MOVE RFC itself also doesn't say anything about it ever having to be atomic.
Although if by atomicity you mean that you simply want to make sure that the
same source mail can't be MOVEd twice, that would be doable wit
Thanks Timo, and no, I can't (easily) change the code of the client.
I must say I am extremely disappointed that intra-account moves are not
atomic. As far as I can tell, IMAP was designed to allow shared access, so
in my opinion this operation should be atomic. Heaven FORBID that I should
ask fo
On 04 Aug 2014, at 14:12, Greg Sullivan wrote:
> Yes, both client and server support IMAP MOVE, and both also support
> CONDSTORE.
>
> I have tried both with and without CONDSTORE enabled in the client, with
> the same result.
With CONDSTORE I was thinking you could do it something like:
1 FET
Yes, both client and server support IMAP MOVE, and both also support
CONDSTORE.
I have tried both with and without CONDSTORE enabled in the client, with
the same result.
I am very confident IMAP MOVE is actually being invoked, because
intra-account moves occur extremely rapidly. (much faster than
Am 04.08.2014 um 14:00 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:44, Greg Sullivan wrote:
>
>> I would like to use a shared IMAP account, with multiple users accessing it
>> simultaneously. The users would take ownership of messages by first
>> attempting to MOVE the messages from the Inb
On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:44, Greg Sullivan wrote:
> I would like to use a shared IMAP account, with multiple users accessing it
> simultaneously. The users would take ownership of messages by first
> attempting to MOVE the messages from the Inbox, into their private IMAP
> folder, still within the
I would like to use a shared IMAP account, with multiple users accessing it
simultaneously. The users would take ownership of messages by first
attempting to MOVE the messages from the Inbox, into their private IMAP
folder, still within the same account. Now, since there will be multiple
users co
Quoting "Valery V. Sedletski" :
But I tried to create a fresh account in Dovecot (not migrated from
Courier), and it
still shows a intermixed folder order:
a list "" *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Spam"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Sent"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Drafts"
* LIST (\HasNoChild
On Sex, 2013-03-01 at 13:01 +, Valery V. Sedletski wrote:
>
> So, it is legal to even list each folder several times?
>
http://www.dovecot.org/imap-client-coding-howto.html
"LIST reply is very loosely defined. It may be very much out of order.
It may even contain duplicates."
>>
>> But I tried to create a fresh account in Dovecot (not migrated from
>> Courier), and it
>> still shows a intermixed folder order:
>>
>> a list "" *
>> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Spam"
>> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Sent"
>> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Drafts"
>> * LIST (\HasNoChildren)
Quoting "Valery V. Sedletski" :
however what you used at migrate, some from your old clients may not
update their folder searchlist to/at new namespace, or have fixed prefix
setup etc, i didnt remember exactly but i think you can have both
namespace setups somehow for stay compatible with "old
>
>however what you used at migrate, some from your old clients may not
>update their folder searchlist to/at new namespace, or have fixed prefix
>setup etc, i didnt remember exactly but i think you can have both
>namespace setups somehow for stay compatible with "old clients"
>try search list and
Am 28.02.2013 15:57, schrieb Valery V. Sedletski:
>>>
>>> Is there a way to influence the folder sort order in Dovecot?
>>>
>>> WBR,
>>> valery
>>>
>>>
>>
>> comming from courier it may be a namespace problem
>>
>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Courier
>>
>> Dovecot configuration
>>
>> Courier
>>
>> Is there a way to influence the folder sort order in Dovecot?
>>
>> WBR,
>> valery
>>
>>
>
>comming from courier it may be a namespace problem
>
>http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Courier
>
>Dovecot configuration
>
>Courier by default uses "INBOX." as the IMAP namespace for private
>mailboxe
Am 28.02.2013 14:54, schrieb Valery V. Sedletski:
> Hi all
>
> We migrated our IMAP server from Courier to Dovecot. The minor problem
> appeared: Dovecot LIST command
> now shows mailbox listing in some weird order. (I suppose, it is filesystem
> directory order) Previously, with Courier,
> it was
Hi all
We migrated our IMAP server from Courier to Dovecot. The minor problem
appeared: Dovecot LIST command
now shows mailbox listing in some weird order. (I suppose, it is filesystem
directory order) Previously, with Courier,
it was sorted, i.e., the INBOX was the first, followed by other system
On 5.2.2013, at 16.10, Gustavo Sansone wrote:
>>> i'm very confused with the namespace settings. i don't understand what
>>> is the correct way to configure it.
>>> don't need public or shared folders.
>>
>> Easiest to use the default namespace settings. There you wouldn't have
>> any namespace
El 2013-02-05 12:10, Gustavo Sansone escribió:
El 2013-02-05 0:09, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 16:29 -0200, Gustavo Sansone wrote:
hello everyone, i'm new to this list
im running dovecot as imap+pop (2.1.12) and roundcube (0.8.4) as
client.
having problems on saving to
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 16:29 -0200, Gustavo Sansone wrote:
> hello everyone, i'm new to this list
> im running dovecot as imap+pop (2.1.12) and roundcube (0.8.4) as
> client.
>
> having problems on saving to imap folders, with errors on some accounts
>
> my fol
hello everyone, i'm new to this list
im running dovecot as imap+pop (2.1.12) and roundcube (0.8.4) as
client.
having problems on saving to imap folders, with errors on some accounts
my folder structure is as follow:
/home/user/.maildir
/home/user/.maildir/.Drafts
/home/user/.maildir/
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Miha Vrhovnik wrote:
"Adam Szpakowski" wrote on 24.2.2012 17:46:02:
On 24.02.2012 15:47, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-24 9:22 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski
wrote:
Im using Dovecot 1.0.10
Very old - an upgrade would likeley fix your problems...
A client of mine using
"Adam Szpakowski" wrote on 24.2.2012 17:46:02:
>On 24.02.2012 15:47, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2012-02-24 9:22 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski
>> wrote:
>>> Im using Dovecot 1.0.10
>> Very old - an upgrade would likeley fix your problems...
>A client of mine using iPhone1 has the same problem on D
On 24.02.2012 15:47, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-24 9:22 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski
wrote:
Im using Dovecot 1.0.10
Very old - an upgrade would likeley fix your problems...
A client of mine using iPhone1 has the same problem on Dovecot 2.0.15.
Only inbox is synced automatically.
--
Adam
On 2012-02-24 6:22 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski wrote:
> Hi
>
> Im using Dovecot 1.0.10 and everything seems work ok except one client
> He is accessing his mailbox using iPhone
> There are several custom folders created and mail is directed to them
> using procmail
> The problem is iPhone mail app
On 2012-02-24 9:22 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski
wrote:
Im using Dovecot 1.0.10
Very old - an upgrade would likeley fix your problems...
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
Hi
Im using Dovecot 1.0.10 and everything seems work ok except one client
He is accessing his mailbox using iPhone
There are several custom folders created and mail is directed to them
using procmail
The problem is iPhone mail app only sees changes in INBOX and when new
mail arrives to other fo
On 12/29/2011 2:02 PM, David Pottage wrote:
On 28/12/11 22:21, Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting David Pottage:
Firstly I wanted to retain the option to switch to the full version of
my mail folders if I needed to access something urgently. My smart-phone
based email client allows me to change the po
On 12/29/2011 2:02 PM, David Pottage wrote:
On 28/12/11 22:21, Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting David Pottage:
Firstly I wanted to retain the option to switch to the full version of
my mail folders if I needed to access something urgently. My smart-phone
based email client allows me to change the po
On 28/12/11 22:21, Rick Romero wrote:
>
> Quoting David Pottage :
>> Firstly I wanted to retain the option to switch to the full version of
>> my mail folders if I needed to access something urgently. My smart-phone
>> based email client allows me to change the port number of an existing
>> email a
On 28/12/11 22:12, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> It's a smart phone. Have you considering simply running a webmail server?
I considered it for about 10 seconds.
Webmail is much less efficent than IMAP both for the server and the
client. I run SquirrelMail on (on Apache) my server, and it consumes far
mo
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
