On 30.06.2016 13:45, Dave wrote:
>
> A very minor patch to support redis AUTH (for all that's worth)
> using an extra password= field. I'm not sure if this will be of any
> value to anyone here. We're testing it in development and "it works
> for us" but it's yet to be used in anger.
>
>
A very minor patch to support redis AUTH (for all that's worth) using
an extra password= field. I'm not sure if this will be of any value to
anyone here. We're testing it in development and "it works for us" but
it's yet to be used in anger.
Sorry if I'm going about this the wrong way, I t
