On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 9/23/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
Charles (and Nikolay), thanks very much for pointing me at the TB3 beta.
And of course, they just released b4...
Literally the day after I upgraded to b3. :)
I didnt check the changelog to
On 9/23/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
> Charles (and Nikolay), thanks very much for pointing me at the TB3 beta.
And of course, they just released b4...
I didnt check the changelog to see if any of your issues were addressed,
but I certainly hope - since you are apparently goin
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 9/21/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
They've been using Thunderbird for some time and I'm finding the following
issues there:
I highly recommend you try the new Thunderbird 3 builds (current is b3 I
believe)...
It has mucho, much
On 9/21/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote:
> I hate this (because I have a LOT of mail and do NOT want to have to
> wait for hours for it all to download the first time I set up my account
> on a new PC),
I should have also mentioned, Sync On Demand is already possible with
th
On 9/21/2009, Nikolay Shopik (sho...@inblock.ru) wrote:
>> app and starting the whole process again. dovecot deals with this more
>> gracefully than the old server (Courier), but it's still an issue
>> -offline operation would be handy sometimes, but tbird has no "hybrid"
>> mode, and again, one mu
On 9/21/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
> They've been using Thunderbird for some time and I'm finding the following
> issues there:
I highly recommend you try the new Thunderbird 3 builds (current is b3 I
believe)...
It has mucho, much IMAP improvements, too many to go into...
On 21.09.2009 8:07, Charles Sprickman wrote:
They've been using Thunderbird for some time and I'm finding the
following issues there:
-searches across 2GB+ of mail are painfully slow, since it's all
server-side
TB3 does solve this problem with gloda, which index everything locally.
-while the
On Sep 21, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
On 2009-09-21 14:21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
-searches across 2GB+ of mail are painfully slow, since it's all
server-side
You could improve this with http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009-09-21 14:21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
>> -searches across 2GB+ of mail are painfully slow, since it's all
>> server-side
>
> You could improve this with http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
-searches across 2GB+ of mail are painfully slow, since it's all
server-side
You could improve this with http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
All,
This is slightly OT, but I figure a bunch of folks running IMAP servers
should have some strong opinions on the topic.
While working on a migration to Dovecot, I had the opportunity to move one
account to a server running same. This is an in-house billing department
box that 3-4 people
11 matches
Mail list logo