On Monday, November 24 at 12:28 AM, quoth Timo Sirainen:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz.sig
Hooray!
Unfortunately, I ran into a problem.
In my config, I have enabled only two authentication mechanisms: plain
and login
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> Having different quota roots for different mailboxes? No, that won't be
> fixed anytime soon. Did you see my reply on Friday about it?
I had indeed missed it. Thank you for the answer. I understand that what
looks simple to me is more complicated deep in the code :-)
Lau
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 10:52 -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2008, at 4:15 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> >> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz
> >> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz.sig
> > Apparently people are very eager to try v1.1.7 and although the
>
On Nov 24, 2008, at 4:15 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz.sig
Apparently people are very eager to try v1.1.7 and although the
ManageSieve patch could still apply and compile correctly, I have
ref
For gentoo users, I created the ebuild for it at
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248565
feel free to test it :)
Ala'a A. Ibrahim wrote:
> Does the managesieve patch for 1.1.6 works with it or do we need to wait
> for a new release?
>
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> http://dovecot.org/release
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz.sig
Apparently people are very eager to try v1.1.7 and although the
ManageSieve patch could still apply and compile correctly, I have
refreshed it for the new release
Does the managesieve patch for 1.1.6 works with it or do we need to wait
for a new release?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz.sig
>
> I should have released this earlier since v1.1.6 had that annoying
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 23:47 +0100, Laurent Blume wrote:
> > * IMAP QUOTA extension now returns "MESSAGE" quota, not "MESSAGES".
> > This makes Dovecot now RFC 2087 compliant. Hopefully this change
> > doesn't break anyone's Dovecot-specific quota checking code..
>
> Good, does that
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 17:36 -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > BTW. v1.2 progresses nicely. Now that shared mailboxes are finally
> > fully
> > supported, there aren't any widely used IMAP features missing from
> > Dovecot. v1.2.beta1 shouldn't be i
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
BTW. v1.2 progresses nicely. Now that shared mailboxes are finally fully
supported, there aren't any widely used IMAP features missing from
Dovecot. v1.2.beta1 shouldn't be in too distant future anymore.
Great, I'm quite interested in shared mailboxes!
* IMAP Q
On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
BTW. v1.2 progresses nicely. Now that shared mailboxes are finally
fully
supported, there aren't any widely used IMAP features missing from
Dovecot. v1.2.beta1 shouldn't be in too distant future anymore.
That is great news. Do you anticipat
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz.sig
I should have released this earlier since v1.1.6 had that annoying
startup problem, but surprisingly few people complained about it so I
kind of forgot about it then.
BTW. v1.2 progresses
12 matches
Mail list logo
