pod wrote:
Note that the anyof() commands are only necessary when you have multiple
tests per if command. Also, I removed the envelope require, since it is
not used.
Out of interest is the conditional around
if true
{
redirect :copy "al...@domain.com";
}
necessary? Does a
Stephan Bosch writes:
> Yes, your second rule is an elsif, meaning that it is only executed when
> the first if-condition is not 'true'. Since that first rule has a forced
> true' result, the second rule is absolutely never executed. You script
> should be:
>
> require ["fileinto","copy"];
>
> #
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:38:51 +0200
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Nikita Koshikov schreef:
> > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:29:26 +0200
> > Stephan Bosch wrote:
> >> I am not exactly sure what you mean. Why are you providing an explicit
> >> keep command when you want to sort the message further?
> > Withou
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:32:20 +0200
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> You are using a if/elseif/else statement. When the if clause (which is
> always true) is matched, the stuff in the elsif/else clauses is discarded.
>
> You'll need to use 2 separate if statements to make this work.
>
Thank you for explana
Nikita Koshikov schreef:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:29:26 +0200
Stephan Bosch wrote:
I am not exactly sure what you mean. Why are you providing an explicit
keep command when you want to sort the message further?
Without keep action - mail just redirected to specified mailbox, but it doesn't
stor
Nikita Koshikov schreef:
>>
> This is my current rule list:
>
> require ["fileinto","envelope","copy"];
> # rule:[redirect]
> if anyof (true)
> {
> redirect :copy "al...@domain.com";
> }
> # rule:[Cron]
> elsif anyof (header :contains "Subject" "Cron")
> {
> fileinto "INBOX/Cron";
> }
>
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:29:26 +0200
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Stephan.
> I am not exactly sure what you mean. Why are you providing an explicit
> keep command when you want to sort the message further? I would think
> the following example script does what you need:
>
Without
Nikita Koshikov schreef:
Hello list,
My question: is sieve support some kind of "continue" action, to explicit tell
server processing rules below current one(if current has triged)?
Situation:
I have few rules, which fileinto's to different directories. All is working
fine, but if I want redi
Hello list,
My question: is sieve support some kind of "continue" action, to explicit tell
server processing rules below current one(if current has triged)?
Situation:
I have few rules, which fileinto's to different directories. All is working
fine, but if I want redirect all my mail for some p
