Hi Ben,
thank you for your quick answer.
"doesn't work" should mean, the message is delivered to the INBOX. There
is only one quite simple sieve-script for this user (generated by
roundcube). Here's the complete script:
--
require ["regex","fileinto"];
# rule:[mov
At 9AM +0100 on 3/12/12 you (Daniel Funke) wrote:
>
> I have a sieve filter for a mailbox with amavisd-admin mails.
>
> if header :regex "Subject" "^INVALID HEADER"
> {
> fileinto "INVALID HEADER";
> }
>
> After the upgrade to dovecot 2.1.12 this filter doesn't work for some
> (16) me
Hi,
I have a sieve filter for a mailbox with amavisd-admin mails.
if header :regex "Subject" "^INVALID HEADER"
{
fileinto "INVALID HEADER";
}
After the upgrade to dovecot 2.1.12 this filter doesn't work for some
(16) messages with this subject. For 424 messages it worked correct.
Any
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:17:07 +0200
fakessh @ wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:01:55 +0200
> Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
> > Op 4-7-2011 14:19, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
> > > Le lundi 4 juillet 2011 00:40, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
> > > > I just change my sieve script by removing the implic
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:01:55 +0200
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 4-7-2011 14:19, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
> > Le lundi 4 juillet 2011 00:40, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
> > > I just change my sieve script by removing the implicit discard a
> > > fileinto :create "Junk.spam.spam"
> [...]
> >
Op 4-7-2011 14:19, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
Le lundi 4 juillet 2011 00:40, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
> I just change my sieve script by removing the implicit discard a
> fileinto :create "Junk.spam.spam"
[...]
it just happened a mail that was issued in INBOX.spam.spam supposedly
a
Le lundi 4 juillet 2011 00:40, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
> Le dimanche 3 juillet 2011 23:57, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
> > On 07/03/2011 10:22 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
> > > I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve
> > > script is silently discard
> > > after
Le dimanche 3 juillet 2011 23:57, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
> On 07/03/2011 10:22 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
> > I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve
> > script is silently discard
> > after delivery but never returned to the inbox
> >
> > all testimonials are we
On 07/03/2011 10:22 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
>
> I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve script
> is silently discard
> after delivery but never returned to the inbox
>
> all testimonials are welcome
[...]
> plugin {
[...]
> plugin = $mail_plugins autocrea
hello folks
hello Timo
hello all the guru
I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve script
is silently discard
after delivery but never returned to the inbox
all testimonials are welcome
my dovecot -n
~]# /usr/sbin/dovecot -n
# 2.0.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS
Le mercredi 22 juin 2011 16:41, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
> Op 22-6-2011 16:05, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
> > Le mercredi 22 juin 2011 10:21, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
> >> Op 22-6-2011 3:18, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
> >>> I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve
>
Op 22-6-2011 16:05, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
Le mercredi 22 juin 2011 10:21, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
Op 22-6-2011 3:18, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve
script is silently discard
We cannot say much about this problem, unl
Le mercredi 22 juin 2011 10:21, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
> Op 22-6-2011 3:18, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
> > hello folks
> > hello Timo
> > hello all the guru
> >
> > I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve
> > script is silently discard
> > after delivery but never
Op 22-6-2011 3:18, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
hello folks
hello Timo
hello all the guru
I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve script
is silently discard
after delivery but never returned to the inbox
all testimonials are welcome
We cannot say much about this
hello folks
hello Timo
hello all the guru
I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve script
is silently discard
after delivery but never returned to the inbox
all testimonials are welcome
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserve
hi dovecot network
hi timo
hi sieve writer
I know one thing sieve scripts must be simple and follow the manual, knowing
what he must do the thing well must wear a kind of precise name envellope
sorry I'm not going to school
I use sieve scripts for some time are published on my blog
I just crea
Hi,
"header :is From" compares against the whole From: header. You only
want to test the containing email address. See
address
This lets you match on only an address field's email address, not its
associated name. For example, I could send an email as "John Smith" >. The test header "From"
On 10/11/2010 21:14, A.L.E.C wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:01:02 +0100, Simone Caruso wrote:
I have a problem with a sieve script..
my config is dovecot 1.2.15 with managesieve, and roundcube.
if anyof (header :contains "From" "x...@example.com")
if anyof (header :is "From" "t...@ardeek.com")
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:01:02 +0100, Simone Caruso wrote:
I have a problem with a sieve script..
my config is dovecot 1.2.15 with managesieve, and roundcube.
if anyof (header :contains "From" "x...@example.com")
if anyof (header :is "From" "t...@ardeek.com")
":is" is an absolute match, ":contain
I have a problem with a sieve script..
my config is dovecot 1.2.15 with managesieve, and roundcube.
Now i have this script WORKING:
--
require ["fileinto"];
# rule:[TracSvil]
if anyof (header :contains "From" "x...@example.com")
{
fileinto "INBOX.Trac Svil";
stop;
}
--
And this
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 21:06 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> > May 10 17:45:04 greer dovecot: deliver(stan): write() failed with
> mbox file
> > /home/stan/mail/1-Debian-Users: File too large
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/f7527971fed0 will probably help in
future too.
Patrick Nagel put forth on 5/11/2010 10:45 PM:
> It's a Wiki, why don't you just change it? :)
I assumed it was limited access--never thought to try. Making changes now...
Done.
--
Stan
Charles Marcus put forth on 5/11/2010 7:53 AM:
> On 2010-05-10 10:06 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> I set it to zero and that fixed the problem. This is indeed one strange
>> situation. The error was reported in the log by dovecot, but the setting
>> that fixes the problem is actually in Postfix. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2010-05-12 11:31, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> From http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA:
>>
>> "Note that Postfix's mailbox_size_limit setting applies to all files
>> that are written to. So if you have a limit of 50 MB, deliver can't
>> write to log files
B. Johannessen put forth on 5/11/2010 1:31 AM:
> On 11/05/10 04:06, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> It would be nice if there
>> was a short heads up regarding this in the dovecot wiki postfix LDA
>> and/or
>> sieve sections. I'll mention this on postfix-user as well.
>
> From http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA
On 2010-05-10 10:06 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I set it to zero and that fixed the problem. This is indeed one strange
> situation. The error was reported in the log by dovecot, but the setting
> that fixes the problem is actually in Postfix. It would be nice if there
> was a short heads up rega
On 11/05/10 04:06, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
It would be nice if there
was a short heads up regarding this in the dovecot wiki postfix LDA and/or
sieve sections. I'll mention this on postfix-user as well.
From http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA:
"Note that Postfix's mailbox_size_limit setting applies to
Apologies for pointing the finger at lda/sieve. After much digging and
Googling I found that the problem actually lies with a Postfix default
setting, specifically:
"mailbox_size_limit (default: 5120)
The maximal size of any local(8) individual mailbox or maildir file, or
zero (no limit)
I would not have expected this upon implementing sieve. And I really need
to get around this limitation. LDA has no problem writing to these large
mbox files. Why does sieve have a problem with them? This is very odd.
May 10 17:45:04 greer dovecot: deliver(stan): write() failed with mbox file
Pascal Volk schrieb:
On 07/13/2009 10:06 AM M. Bobkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
I?m facing here a wierd problem: We have a vacation messaging system
using sieve. When activated the system forwards incomming messages to a
given address and sents an out of office reply to the sender. This works
like a cha
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>> It's RFC recommended practice, see RFC 3834:
>
> I know. Just for this I re-calcalculated my email address stats.
>
> There is a SHOULD two times. I have replied on this somewhen in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
It's RFC recommended practice, see RFC 3834:
I know. Just for this I re-calcalculated my email address stats.
There is a SHOULD two times. I have replied on this somewhen in the past
already. My email
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:21:39PM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>> This is to avoid auto-replies on messages not addressed directly to you
>> (eg. sent via mailing lists).
>
> a) Mailing lists must set Precedence: bulk
>
> b) Many lists address you in To or CC.
>
> c) Why shall no vacation to be se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
It's a feature, not a bug.
Yes, I hear it often - in many fields.
This is to avoid auto-replies on messages not addressed directly to you
(eg. sent via mailing lists).
a) Mailing lists must set Prece
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:03:38PM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> You have to enumerate all addresses in the ":address" tag of vacation.
> It's actually a real pain here.
It's a feature, not a bug.
This is to avoid auto-replies on messages not addressed directly to you
(eg. sent via mailing lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, M. Bobkiewicz wrote:
vacation
:days 1
:subject "Out of Office reply"
"
The auto reply text.
";
Any advice is welcome,
You have to enumerate all addresses in the ":address" tag of vacation.
It's actually a real
On 07/13/2009 10:06 AM M. Bobkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
> I?m facing here a wierd problem: We have a vacation messaging system
> using sieve. When activated the system forwards incomming messages to a
> given address and sents an out of office reply to the sender. This works
> like a charm when the ma
Hi,
I?m facing here a wierd problem: We have a vacation messaging system
using sieve. When activated the system forwards incomming messages to a
given address and sents an out of office reply to the sender. This works
like a charm when the mail is addressed to mail...@domain. When the
incommin
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:07:35 +0300, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Any suggestions on how to disable this ? I'd like to be able to filter
> all spam by default with sieve, and still allow users to have their own
> rules.
We autocreate a 'mailfilter.sieve' in each new user's homed
Any suggestions on how to disable this ? I'd like to be able to filter
all spam by default with sieve, and still allow users to have their own
rules.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am new here, so excuse me if i am asking something already asked. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I am new here, so excuse me if i am asking something already asked. I am
> using dovecot 1.1.2 along with postfix 2.6 and a pgsql backend. So far
> everything is great, until i wanted to try out the sieve implementation.
> I am using dovecot for deliver and
Hello,
I am new here, so excuse me if i am asking something already asked. I am
using dovecot 1.1.2 along with postfix 2.6 and a pgsql backend. So far
everything is great, until i wanted to try out the sieve implementation.
I am using dovecot for deliver and i have set
global_script_path = /home/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Also the errors are better the newer the version of dovecot (upgrading
>> may
>> help in that regard).
>>
>
> I'd upgraded to version dovecot-1.0.10-0_66.
> Now I get more logs in dovecot-deliver.log, but things still not work:
>
> deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Feb 22
> .dovecot.sieve compile correctly into .dovecot.sievec
>
> But I keep getting this error in dovecot-deliver.log:
>
> deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Info: sieve runtime error:
> Fileinto:
> Generic Error
> deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Error:
> sieve_execute_bytecode(/var/spool/mail/sieve-scripts/[EMAIL
On 2/21/2008, Varadi Zoltan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Dovecot version : 1.0-0.1.rc7
Dovecot-sieve version: 1.0.2-6 (this is a problem?)
First problem is the version... it is WAY too old...
You need to upgrade to a release version (current is 1.0.10), or mayeb
even the newer 1.1, which is al
Hi all!
Os : Fedora 6
Dovecot version : 1.0-0.1.rc7
Dovecot-sieve version: 1.0.2-6 (this is a problem?)
Config :
# dovecot -n
# /etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: imaps pop3s
disable_plaintext_auth: yes
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_
46 matches
Mail list logo
