On 6/2/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
>> obviously the LDA (in addition to postfix) would have to understand that
>> they are the same, and Sieve would as well, in order to be able to
>> filter/file into a folder based on a matching rule *if* one exists - or
>> just Del
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
To insert a '.' anyplace into the recipient name, you have to do
something on MTA level. E.g. with sendmail you could map:
'lo.calRecpient' to 'localRecipient+lo.calRecpient'
But that's not what I want. I
On 6/2/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
>> The reason I ask is, some sites don't allow the use of the '+'
>> delimiter, so having a second optional character, and/or the ability to
>> use a dot anywhere in the local part, would provide a workaround to
>> these site...
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
The reason I ask is, some sites don't allow the use of the '+'
delimiter, so having a second optional character, and/or the ability to
use a dot anywhere in the local part, would provide a workaround to
thes
On 5/29/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote:
Hmm. Stephan, you currently have sieve_subaddress_sep setting. Should we
instead use a common setting here? Like:
protocol lda {
recipient_delimiter = +
}
>>> With v1.2 it probably wouldn't do anything,
On 5/29/2009 3:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>> I was wondering whether it will handle
>>> recipient delimiters. ie will it be able to map
>>> user+...@example.com to u...@example.com?
>>> I'm not interested in the delivery into folder stuff,
>>> just the plain delivery to inbox.
>> Hmm. Stephan, y
Timo Sirainen schreef:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 20:45 +0200, John Fawcett wrote:
I read in the list archives about work in progress on
an lmtp delivery agent.As a previous cyrus user
where that was the preferred delivery method
from postfix, this sounds interesting.
I was wondering whether it will
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 20:45 +0200, John Fawcett wrote:
> I read in the list archives about work in progress on
> an lmtp delivery agent.As a previous cyrus user
> where that was the preferred delivery method
> from postfix, this sounds interesting.
>
> I was wondering whether it will handle
> reci
I read in the list archives about work in progress on
an lmtp delivery agent.As a previous cyrus user
where that was the preferred delivery method
from postfix, this sounds interesting.
I was wondering whether it will handle
recipient delimiters. ie will it be able to map
user+...@example.com to u
