On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:16:58 +0200 Stephan Bosch
wrote:
> As a matter of fact, I haven't looked at TRE before. I'm quite
> interested though, since it is backwards compatible with POSIX and
> seems to be available in most systems. I'll give it a closer look,
> also in terms of compatibility with
On 07/13/2010 10:16 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
The standard regexp library does not support unicode and I was not
planning to write my own regexp compiler any time soon.
I wouldn't want to write one as well.
As a matter of fact, I haven't looked at TRE before. I'm quite
interested though, since
Trever L. Adams wrote:
Hello,
I am just learning about pigeonhole and thinking of using it. I see
that regex doesn't supportf UTF-8. Any particular reason for this?
The standard regexp library does not support unicode and I was not
planning to write my own regexp compiler any time soon.
If
Hello,
I am just learning about pigeonhole and thinking of using it. I see that
regex doesn't supportf UTF-8. Any particular reason for this?
If it is a library problem is the library, have you looked at tre? I am
using it in a project (I am using it in wchar_t mode because elsewhere
all da
