Re: [Dovecot] migration and conversion from courier

2009-05-18 Thread Giuliano Gavazzi
On M 18 May, 2009, at 01:00 , Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 00:57 +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: There's only one point that escapes me, why perform the conversion when migrating (using the --convert option) given that on the system where I did not perform it the flags have been p

Re: [Dovecot] migration and conversion from courier

2009-05-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 00:57 +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: > There's only one point that escapes me, why perform the conversion > when migrating (using the --convert option) given that on the system > where I did not perform it the flags have been preserved (the files > got their name change

Re: [Dovecot] migration and conversion from courier

2009-05-17 Thread Giuliano Gavazzi
On S 17 May, 2009, at 20:45 , Timo Sirainen wrote: On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 10:55 +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: Perhaps the only solution is to have a new script that deletes the garbage lines and renumbers the following ones, so that the above example would become: 0 JunkRecorded 1 $NotJunk 2

Re: [Dovecot] migration and conversion from courier

2009-05-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 10:55 +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: > I doubt though that the script will cope with flags correctly, as in > principle will get the flags from an out of date courierimapkeywords, > thus missing any new ones. Right. > Perhaps the only solution is to have a new script tha

[Dovecot] migration and conversion from courier

2009-05-15 Thread Giuliano Gavazzi
Dear all, back in January I posted about migration from courier and in particular on the script courier-dovecot-migrate.pl. That script had a bug on BSD (or should I say not-Linux?) type systems*. On FreeBSD (6.1) and MacOSX (10.5) it appended a lot of binary garbage at the end of dovecot-k