Am 17.12.2012 08:31, schrieb Angel L. Mateo:
>> But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck
>> on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem.
>>
> Wouldn't be easier just to split your users between different
> filesystems? I mean having differen
Am 15.12.2012 09:23, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:> On 12/15/2012 1:44 AM, Peer
Heinlein wrote:
>> But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck
>> on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem.
>
> Peer are you using NFS or a cluster filesystem? Linux on th
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 08:44 +0100, Peer Heinlein wrote:
> The mdbox-format with the altstorage-feature is quite nice and important.
>
> But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck
> on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem.
>
> It would be much
El 15/12/12 08:44, Peer Heinlein escribió:
The mdbox-format with the altstorage-feature is quite nice and important.
But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck
on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem.
Wouldn't be easier just to split your
On 12/15/2012 1:44 AM, Peer Heinlein wrote:
> But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck
> on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem.
Peer are you using NFS or a cluster filesystem? Linux on the hosts or
other?
--
Stan
The mdbox-format with the altstorage-feature is quite nice and important.
But we're having much more then >> 30 TB of maildata and doing an fsck
on huge partitions takes too much (down-) time for our mailsystem.
It would be much easier, if Dovecot would be able to use at least THREE
storage-path
