On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 16:42 +0200, Joseba Torre wrote:
> > Add to service lmtp:
> > process_min_avail = 20
> I had a similar problem, and found the same solution. In my setup, only 1
> lmtp
> process was available and a 2nd one never was created, so the process was
> really busy. With this para
On Lunes 17 Octubre 2011 16:31:01 Juan Carlos Sanchez escribió:
> A particular reply (not to the list) has told me to try:
>
> "
> Add to service lmtp:
> process_min_avail = 20
> "
>
> And yes, it works (unless for me), so I want to share it with everybody.
>
> Have not exactly measured performa
A particular reply (not to the list) has told me to try:
"
Add to service lmtp:
process_min_avail = 20
"
And yes, it works (unless for me), so I want to share it with everybody.
Have not exactly measured performance but this morning have seen over
1400 messages/minute with lmtp under heavy loa
Hello:
In the process of migration from version 1.2 to 2.0 have tried to use
lmtp instead of lda as delivery agent.
But unfortunately througput we get is poor with lmtp compared to lda.
In peak times with lda we are able to deliver over 1800 messages/minute
(high I/O but not affecting service
