On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 13:26 -0500, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> I just found this in my logs. Any idea?
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> 12/4/12 12:33:43.831 PM dovecot[2660]: indexer-worker(dave): Panic: file
> mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): ass
I just found this in my logs. Any idea?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
12/4/12 12:33:43.831 PM dovecot[2660]: indexer-worker(dave): Panic: file
mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed:
(mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name))
12/4
On 28.6.2012, at 13.38, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> 29413 root 1 760 22820K 9204K kqread 1 0:17 5.86%
>>> indexer-worker
>>
>> It runs as root while not really doing anything, but when it starts
>> accessing users' files it temporarily drops privileges. This is
>> necessary
29413 root 1 760 22820K 9204K kqread 1 0:17 5.86%
indexer-worker
It runs as root while not really doing anything, but when it starts
accessing users' files it temporarily drops privileges. This is
necessary if users have multiple different UIDs.
to showed it with root pr
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 07:54 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> why this process (which most probably do squat index/update) runs as root,
> not - like imap process - as user?
>
> 29413 root 1 760 22820K 9204K kqread 1 0:17 5.86%
> indexer-worker
It runs as root while not real
why this process (which most probably do squat index/update) runs as root,
not - like imap process - as user?
29413 root 1 760 22820K 9204K kqread 1 0:17 5.86%
indexer-worker