On 2/14/2009 9:59 AM, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
>>> I can see 1.1.9-1 in Experimental, but not even in Unstable yet.
>>> So I'm not ready to try it on production machines.
>> I could never use a distro that required me to use outdated/buggy
>> software...
> So you prefer to use the new&shiny versio
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/12/2009, Maarten Bezemer (mcbdove...@robuust.nl) wrote:
Strangest thing about this is that it only seems to happen when an
email is read first through webmail.
What were you using for webmail again?
Squirrelmail, using the same imap server as
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/12/2009, Maarten Bezemer (mcbdove...@robuust.nl) wrote:
I can see 1.1.9-1 in Experimental, but not even in Unstable yet. So
I'm not ready to try it on production machines.
I could never use a distro that required me to use outdated/buggy
softwa
Quoting John and Catherine Allen :
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up
with random missing emails. Im trying to figure out if it is user
error, or som
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express (imap)
as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with random
missing emails. Im trying to figure out if it is user error, or
something wacky in my mailserver. I cant fin
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:17:41AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 2-12-2009 2:10 AM Aiko Barz spake the following:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:27:02PM -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
> > wrote:
> >> Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express (imap)
> >> as an em
On 2/12/2009, Scott Silva (ssi...@sgvwater.com) wrote:
> I just found this;
> http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=736
> I guess Outlook 2003 introduced a newer version of the PST files that has a
> 20GB (twenty GB ) limit, but they have to be created with 2003, and they are
On 2/12/2009, Maarten Bezemer (mcbdove...@robuust.nl) wrote:
> Strangest thing about this is that it only seems to happen when an
> email is read first through webmail.
What were you using for webmail again?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2/12/2009, Maarten Bezemer (mcbdove...@robuust.nl) wrote:
> I can see 1.1.9-1 in Experimental, but nog even in Unstable yet. So
> I'm not ready to try it on production machines.
I could never use a distro that required me to use outdated/buggy
software...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2/12/2009, Maarten Bezemer (mcbdove...@robuust.nl) wrote:
> I've seen users with about 1GB worth of Maildir folders and some
> 800MB of IMAP cache PST. So it might not be headers only in there...
Or they never compact their PST files.
This MUST be done manually... tha auto-compact 'feature' is
Words by Maarten Bezemer [Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:31:28AM +0100]:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> on 2-12-2009 10:35 AM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
>> It would take a LOT of messages to cache 2 GB of headers.
>
> I've seen users with about 1GB worth of Maildir folders an
on 2-12-2009 3:48 PM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> I just found this;
>> http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=736
>> I guess Outlook 2003 introduced a newer version of the PST files that
>> has a
>> 20GB (twenty GB )
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
I just found this;
http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=736
I guess Outlook 2003 introduced a newer version of the PST files that has a
20GB (twenty GB ) limit, but they have to be created with 2003, and they are
not backward compa
on 2-12-2009 3:31 PM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> on 2-12-2009 10:35 AM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
>>> Outlook DOES store some kind of cache of IMAP mail in a PST. And that
>>> PST is always located in the Local Settings direct
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
on 2-12-2009 10:35 AM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
Outlook DOES store some kind of cache of IMAP mail in a PST. And that
PST is always located in the Local Settings directory, regardless of
your system-wide default location of PSTs.
I don't kno
on 2-12-2009 10:35 AM Maarten Bezemer spake the following:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> Outlook does not store IMAP mail in its PST. PST's are only used for
>> the local
>> storage. Outlook does not crash if your IMAP mail folders are larger
>> than 2
>> GB, although its IMAP
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
Outlook does not store IMAP mail in its PST. PST's are only used for the local
storage. Outlook does not crash if your IMAP mail folders are larger than 2
GB, although its IMAP implementation is pretty bad.
Outlook DOES store some kind of cache of IMAP
on 2-12-2009 2:10 AM Aiko Barz spake the following:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:27:02PM -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
> wrote:
>> Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express (imap)
>> as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with random
>> missi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:27:02PM -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
> Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express (imap)
> as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with random
> missing emails. Im trying to figure out if it is user error, or
Jack Stewart wrote:
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Quoting Jack Stewart :
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Quoting Jack Stewart :
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a
Quoting Jack Stewart :
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with
random missing
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with
random missing emails. Im trying to fi
Thanks I'll check it out. Just what I need, more log files ;-].
take care,
ddh
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a coupl
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
> Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
> (imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with
> random missing emails. Im trying to figure out if it is user error,
> or s
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with
random missing emails. Im trying to figure out if it is user error,
or something wacky in my mailserver. I cant find anything telling in
maillog files o
26 matches
Mail list logo
